ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filing
360
ORDER re 355 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; AND 339 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ; AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SERVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/7/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
CISCO SYSTEMS INC, et al.,
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 13-cv-01300-JSW
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
SEAL AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS
TO SERVE ORDER
Re: Docket Nos. 339 and 355
12
Defendants have filed two motions to seal, which pertain to the opening and reply briefs on
13
14
their motion for leave to amend, and exhibits submitted in support of that motion. According to
15
Defendants’ motion, Clyde Boenke designated certain materials as confidential. Although
16
Defendants served a copy of their motion on Mr. Boenke through his counsel, the Court has not
17
received a declaration on Mr. Boenke’s behalf that demonstrates why the material identified in the
18
motion to seal docketed at 339 should be maintained under seal. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 79-5(e). The
19
time to respond to the motion docketed at 355 has not yet passed, but it will expire shortly.
The Court is tentatively inclined to file that much of the information designated by Mr.
20
21
Boenke should be filed in the public record. However, in light of the fact that Mr. Boenke is not a
22
party to this dispute, the Court shall give him a further opportunity to comply with Rule 79-
23
5(e)(1). Accordingly, by no later than April 25, 2016, Mr. Boenke shall submit a declaration
24
setting forth his position on why the materials identified by Defendants may be sealed.
If Mr. Boenke fails to file such a declaration, he is HEREBY ADVISED that the Court is
25
26
likely to order the materials filed in the public record.
27
//
28
//
1
2
3
4
It is FU
URTHER OR
RDERED tha Defendant shall serve a copy of t Order on Mr.
at
nts
this
n
Boenke.
S
RED.
IT IS SO ORDER
Da
ated: April 7, 2016
,
5
6
JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?