ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
Filing
382
ORDER GRANTING IN PART 368 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ; AND 372 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Second Amended Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/2/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
CISCO SYSTEMS INC, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
SEAL
Re: Docket Nos. 368, 372
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 13-cv-01300-JSW
12
Now before the Court are Defendants’ administrative motions to seal portions of their
13
14
amended answers and counterclaims. Plaintiffs have submitted a declaration that supports their
15
request to maintain certain portions of the amended answers and counterclaims under seal. Third-
16
party Clyde Boenke has not filed a declaration within the time required, and the Court has
17
previously found the material he designated as confidential is not sealable.
The Cisco Defendants’ administrative motion to seal is GRANTED IN PART: Paragraph
18
19
46 of the Amended Answer, at page 16, line 5 though page 17, line 5 shall remain under seal.
20
HP’s administrative motion to seal is GRANTED IN PART: Paragraph 46 of the Amended
21
Answer at page 14, line 24 through page 15, line 23 shall remain under seal. Defendants shall file
22
revised redacted versions of all documents addressed in this Order by May 6, 2016.
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
2
3
4
It is FU
URTHER ORDERED that Defend
O
t
dants shall s
serve a copy of this Ord on Mr.
y
der
Boenke and sh file proo of such se
hall
of
ervice with the Court.
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: May 2, 2016
5
6
JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?