ChriMar Systems Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al

Filing 411

INCORRECT DOCUMENT ATTACHED - PLEASE DISREGARD AND SEE DOCUMENT NO. 412 ORDER RE: 410 STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME OF RESCHEDULED SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE SET IN DKT. NO. 405 IN VIEW OF TRIAL CONFLICT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/20/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016) Modified on 6/20/2016 (jjoS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/20/2016 (jjoS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

JEANNE SCHERER, Chief Counsel
LUCILLE Y. BACA, Assistant Chief Counsel
DEREK S. VAN HOFTEN (SBN 226880)
STACY J. LAU (SBN 254507)
BRANDON S. WALKER (SBN 254851)
MICHAEL A.G. EINHORN (SBN 252462)
111 Grand Avenue, Suite 11-100, Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION; MALCOLM DOUGHERTY

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THE COYOTE VALLEY BAND OF POMO
INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, et al.,
Defendants.

17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. 4:15-cv-04987-JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO AMEND CASE
SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER
SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS
AS MODIFIED HEREIN AND CONTINUING
Dept.:
Courtroom 5 CASE MANAGEMENT
Judge:
Hon. Jeffrey S. White CONFERENCE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

WHEREAS, following the May 18, 2016, settlement discussions at the U.S. District Court
before Howard Herman, Director of the Court’s ADR Program, Plaintiffs and Defendants California
Department of Transportation and Malcolm Dougherty (“Caltrans”) have exchanged proposed
settlement agreements, as previously agreed to by the parties and as reflected in their previous
stipulation submitted to this Court (ECF 50);
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Caltrans agree that the settlement discussions have been
productive to date and that further settlement discussions would be worthwhile, and have agreed to
such discussions continuing, and possible subsequent settlement meetings as warranted;

27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS –
Case No. 4:15-cv-04987-JSW

WHEREAS, to help facilitate these additional settlement discussions, Plaintiffs and Caltrans

1
2

agree that an additional short extension of the date for lodging the administrative records in this

3

action is appropriate;
WHEREAS, the requested extension of time for the record will not necessitate any other

4
5

changes to the current case schedule, which next presents a case management conference on July 8,

6

2016;

7
8
9

NOW THEREFORE, by and through their undersigned counsel, the parties do hereby
stipulate as follows:
1. The date for lodging the administrative records in this action, currently set for June 27,

10

2016 (ECF 50), shall be extended to July 7, 2016, and any motion to extend that deadline

11

further shall be filed by June 24, 2016.

12
13

2. The date for motions regarding disputes over the contents of the administrative records,
currently set for July 11 (ECF 51), shall be extended to July 25, 2016.

14
DATED: June 17, 2016

JEANNE SCHERER
LUCILLE Y. BACA
DEREK S. VAN HOFTEN
STACY LAU
BRANDON WALKER

15
16
17

By: /s/ Derek S. van Hoften _________________
Attorneys for Defendants
CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF TRANSP.;
MALCOLM DOUGHERTY

18
19
20
21

DATED: June 17, 2016

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP

22

By: /s/ Philip L. Gregory
PHILIP L. GREGORY
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

23
24
25

DATED: June 17, 2016

JOHN C. CRUDEN
Assistant Attorney General
Environment and Natural Resources Division

26

By: /s/ David B. Glazer
DAVID B. GLAZER
Attorney for Federal Defendants

27
28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS –
Case No. 4:15-cv-04987-JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the case schedule in this matter is hereby amended as
follows:
1. The administrative records in this action shall be lodged by July 7, 2016, and any motions to
extend that deadline shall be filed by June 24, 2016.
2. Any motions regarding disputes over the contents of the administrative records shall be filed
by July 25, 2016.

3. In light of the pending motion to dismiss, the Court continues the case management conference from
July 8, 2016 to August 12, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. A joint case management statement shall be due by
August 5, 2016. If any party believes a ruling on the motion would facilitate settlement discussions, that
IT IS SO ORDERED. party shall file a notice to that effect by July 1, 2016.

12
13

June 20, 2016
Dated: __________________

_______________________________
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE FOR FURTHER SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS –
Case No. 4:15-cv-04987-JSW