Dudley v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Filing
22
MDL ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Southern District of New York. Signed by the MDL Panel on 5/24/2013. (vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)
Case MDL No. 2434 Document 177 Filed 05/24/13 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2434
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -4)
On April 8, 2013, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, 34 additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Southern District ofNew York. With the consent ofthat court, all such actions
have been assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District ofNew York and assigned to
Judge Seibel.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Liti~ation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Southern District ofNew York for the reasons stated in the order of April 8, 2013, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Southern District ofNew York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
Inasmuch as no objection is
pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
May 24, 2013
CLERK'S OFFICE
UNITED STATES
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
FOR THE PANEL:
~
Jeffery N. Luthi
Clerk of the Panel
IH
A CERTIFIED COPY
HY J. K.RAJIOK, CLERK
-~.....,.:;4-1-
Case MDL No. 2434 Document 177 Filed 05/24/13 Page 2 of 3
IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2434
SCHEDULE CT0-4- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC
2
13-02486
CAC
5
13-00598
Laurie Nordman v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
Inc
Rosy E Gomez et al v. Bayer Healthcare
Pharmaceuticals Inc
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
4
13-01410
Dudley v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et
al
13-02060
Winston v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
ILLINOIS CENTRAL
ILC
2
ILLINOIS NORTHERN
3
13-01766
13-50102
Mehrer v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lopez et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6
13-01144
Caruthers v. Bayer Corporation et al
ILN
ILN
KANSAS
KS
KENTUCKY EASTERN
KYE
6
13-00089
Harmon et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.
KENTUCKY WESTERN
KYW
3
13-00406
Scott v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Jennings v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Thompson v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
MARYLAND
MD
1
13-00807
MD
1
13-01317
Case MDL No. 2434 Document 177 Filed 05/24/13 Page 3 of 3
MINNESOTA
MN
MN
0
0
13-00980
13-00981
Fowler v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Meyer v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN
MSS
3
13-00281
M8S
~
13 00028
Daniels v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
AtlstiH Y. Bayer PfiflffH:aeel:ltieals CsFpsratisH et al Opposed 5/23/13
MISSOURI EASTERN
MOE
4
13-00580
Reed v. Bayer Hea1thcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
13-02591
13-02592
13-02967
PAY ARES v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
HORNER v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
CRAIG v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
NEW JERSEY
NJ
NJ
NJ
2
2
2
PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN
PAE
2
13-01530
SOLANO v. BAYER CORP. et al
13-00224
Villarreal vs. Bayer Corp., et al
TEXAS WESTERN
TXW
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?