Dudley v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 22

MDL ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Southern District of New York. Signed by the MDL Panel on 5/24/2013. (vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)

Download PDF
Case MDL No. 2434 Document 177 Filed 05/24/13 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2434 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -4) On April 8, 2013, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, 34 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District ofNew York. With the consent ofthat court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District ofNew York and assigned to Judge Seibel. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Liti~ation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District ofNew York for the reasons stated in the order of April 8, 2013, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District ofNew York. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. May 24, 2013 CLERK'S OFFICE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FOR THE PANEL: ~ Jeffery N. Luthi Clerk of the Panel IH A CERTIFIED COPY HY J. K.RAJIOK, CLERK -~.....,.:;4-1- Case MDL No. 2434 Document 177 Filed 05/24/13 Page 2 of 3 IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2434 SCHEDULE CT0-4- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 13-02486 CAC 5 13-00598 Laurie Nordman v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc Rosy E Gomez et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 4 13-01410 Dudley v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al 13-02060 Winston v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc ILLINOIS CENTRAL ILC 2 ILLINOIS NORTHERN 3 13-01766 13-50102 Mehrer v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Lopez et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 6 13-01144 Caruthers v. Bayer Corporation et al ILN ILN KANSAS KS KENTUCKY EASTERN KYE 6 13-00089 Harmon et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. KENTUCKY WESTERN KYW 3 13-00406 Scott v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Jennings v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Thompson v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MARYLAND MD 1 13-00807 MD 1 13-01317 Case MDL No. 2434 Document 177 Filed 05/24/13 Page 3 of 3 MINNESOTA MN MN 0 0 13-00980 13-00981 Fowler v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Meyer v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN MSS 3 13-00281 M8S ~ 13 00028 Daniels v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al AtlstiH Y. Bayer PfiflffH:aeel:ltieals CsFpsratisH et al Opposed 5/23/13 MISSOURI EASTERN MOE 4 13-00580 Reed v. Bayer Hea1thcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 13-02591 13-02592 13-02967 PAY ARES v. BAYER CORPORATION et al HORNER v. BAYER CORPORATION et al CRAIG v. BAYER CORPORATION et al NEW JERSEY NJ NJ NJ 2 2 2 PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN PAE 2 13-01530 SOLANO v. BAYER CORP. et al 13-00224 Villarreal vs. Bayer Corp., et al TEXAS WESTERN TXW 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?