Ruiz v. Chase Bank USA, National Association

Filing 13

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER AND INFORM THE COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THEIR CHOICE FOR ALL PURPOSES; AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2013 is CONTINUED to Monday, 7/22/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/11/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

LORI RUIZ,

7
8
9
10

Plaintiff,
vs.
CHASE BANK USA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION,

Case No.: 13-CV-01508-YGR
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEET AND
CONFER AND INFORM COURT WHETHER
THEY CONSENT TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OF THEIR CHOICE FOR ALL PURPOSES; AND
CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

Defendant.

11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

The parties may consent at any time to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge for all
13

purposes, including entry of final judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). This option is being made
14

available because the magistrate judges in this district have smaller civil dockets and no felony
15

criminal cases and may be able to adjudicate this case more expeditiously than the undersigned
16

district judge. The parties are advised that they may jointly request assignment to a specific
17

magistrate judge.
18

Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to promptly meet and confer and advise the
19

Court, no later than Monday, July 15, 2013, whether they consent to a specific magistrate judge or
20

judge(s) of their choice to conduct all further proceedings in the instant action. Profiles of all
21

magistrate judges are available on the Court’s website at http://cand.uscourts.gov/judges and in the
22

brochure, Consenting to a Magistrate Judge’s Jurisdiction In the Northern District of California
23

(.pdf), also available on the Court’s website. Should the parties stipulate, they shall jointly file a
24

stipulation requesting referral to the agreed-upon magistrate judge(s).
25

The Case Management Conference scheduled for July 15, 2013 is hereby CONTINUED to July
26

22, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. If the parties file a joint stipulation, the Case Management Conference will be
27

vacated.
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1

Dated: July 11, 2013

__________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6

[PLAINTIFF'S NAME],

7
8
9
10

Plaintiff,

Case No.: ##-CV-#### YGR
CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

vs.
[DEFENDANT'S NAME] et al.,
Defendant(s).

11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13

In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the undersigned party or

14

parties to the above-captioned civil matter hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States

15

Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the

16

entry of a final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States

17

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

18
19

______________________________

______________________________

______________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff

______________________________
Attorney for Defendant

20
21
22
23
24

Dated:_________________________

25
26
27
28

3