Cadence Design Systems Inc v. Berkeley Design Automation Inc

Filing 35

ORDER TERMINATING MOTION AS WITHDRAWN; SETTING COMPLIANCE DATE. Motions terminated: 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Berkeley Design Automation Inc. Compliance Hearing 1/17/2014 at 9:01am.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/20/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC., 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 Plaintiff, Case No.: 13-CV-01539 YGR ORDER TERMINATING MOTION AS WITHDRAWN; SETTING COMPLIANCE DATE vs. BERKELEY DESIGN AUTOMATION INC., Defendant. 13 14 On December 20, 2013, the Court held a compliance hearing in the above-captioned matter 15 after the parties did not timely file a notice of settlement. As stated on the record, the parties have 16 settled in principle and are finalizing settlement documentation. Further, in light of the imminence of 17 finalization, Defendant orally withdrew its pending motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 17.) Accordingly, 18 the Court directs the Clerk to TERMINATE that motion administratively. 19 The Court SETS a further compliance hearing on its 9:01 a.m. calendar on Friday, January 20 17, 2014, in Courtroom 5 of the United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California. 21 No less than five business days before the compliance hearing, the parties shall jointly file either (1) a 22 Notice of Dismissal of this action or (2) a one-page Statement of non-compliance. If compliance is 23 complete, the hearing shall be vacated and no appearance shall be required. 24 This Order terminates Dkt. No. 17. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Date: December 20, 2013 _______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?