ACP, Inc. v. Skypatrol, LLC et al

Filing 134

Order by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 129 Administrative Motion to Request Case Management Conference.(pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2017)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ACP, INC., Case No. 13-cv-01572-PJH Plaintiff, 5 ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO REQUEST CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 6 7 SKYPATROL, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 129 Defendants. 8 9 Before the court is plaintiff’s ACP, Inc.’s administrative motion to request a case management conference (“CMC”). See Dkt. 129. ACP reports that it has been unable to 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 take the deposition of a key witness, defendant Gordon Howard’s CEO Stan Schwarz, 12 due to Schwarz’s health problems. This has “prohibited fact discovery from being 13 completed,” and disrupted the case management schedule such that the current 14 deadlines are unworkable “in light of the delay and uncertainty regarding Mr. Schwarz’s 15 availability.” Id. Although defendants Gordon Howard and Skypatrol were permitted to 16 proceed with a limited deposition of Schwarz on March 3, 2016, Dkt. 132, ACP was 17 unable to attend as it was afforded only a few days’ notice. Gordon Howard does not 18 oppose the request for a CMC, see Dkt. 130; Skypatrol has not responded. 19 Good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS ACP’s motion and sets a CMC 20 for March 16, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor, Federal Courthouse, 1301 21 Clay Street, Oakland, California. The parties shall submit a case management statement 22 containing their proposals as to reasonable modifications to the pretrial schedule by 23 Thursday, March 9. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 6, 2017 __________________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?