Haas v. Citibank, N.A. et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 34 Stipulation. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)

Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document34 Filed10/04/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5

Thomas J. D'Amato - 219174
David J. Gibson - 272516
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-5530
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

(SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION)
EDWARD HAAS,

12
13
14
15
16

Case No.: CV13-01578 SBA

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE ACTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT REGIONAL
ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

v.
CITIBANK, N.A., REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT
BUREAU, INC., MERIUM DOE, MARIA DOE,
PEARL DOE, JAMES DOE, VICTORIA DOE,
and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Trial Date: June 9, 2014

Defendants.

17
18
19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
-1STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT
BUREAU, INC., WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document34 Filed10/04/13 Page2 of 3

1

TO THE HONORABLE SAUNDRA ARMSTRONG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Edward Haas and

3
4
5
6

Defendant Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc. through their counsel of Record, that:
1.

The above-captioned action, Case No. CV13-01578 SBA, is voluntarily dismissed, with

prejudice, against the Defendant Regional Adjustment Bureau.
2.

The parties stipulating here, Plaintiff Edward Haas and Defendant Regional Adjustment

7

Bureau, Inc., shall be responsible for their own costs and attorneys’ fees associated with this litigation.

8

DATED:
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY

9
10

By /s/ David J. Gibson
David J. Gibson
Attorneys for Defendant
REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT BUREAU

11
12
13
14
15

DATED:
LAW OFFICES OF BEN DUPRE

16
17
18

By /s/ Ben Dupre
Ben Dupre
Attorney for Plaintiff
EDWARD HAAS

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT
BUREAU, INC., WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case4:13-cv-01578-SBA Document34 Filed10/04/13 Page3 of 3

1

ORDER

2

The Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated: 10/4/2013

5
6
_______________________________________
HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG

7
8
9
10

DJG.20679954_2.doc

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION TO DISMISS THE ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT REGIONAL ADJUSTMENT
BUREAU, INC., WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER