Asian Law Caucus v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
Filing
38
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 37 Stipulation TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2014)
1 MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612)
United States Attorney
2 ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348)
Chief, Civil Division
3 JENNIFER S WANG (CSBN 233155)
Assistant United States Attorney
4
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
5
Telephone: (415) 436-6967
FAX: (415) 436-6748
6
jennifer.s.wang@usdoj.gov
7
Attorneys for Federal Defendants
8
JESSICA KARP BANSAL (CA BAR NO. 277347)
9 UC Irvine Immigrant Rights Clinic
c/o National Day Laborer Organizing Network
10 675 S. Park View St.
Los Angeles, CA 90057
11 Tel: (213) 380-2214
Fax: (213) 380-2787
12 jkarp@ndlon.org
13 Attorney for Plaintiff
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
OAKLAND DIVISION
17
ASIAN LAW CAUCUS,
18
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
21
22
23
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 13-1593 SBA
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong
Defendants.
24
25
Subject to the approval of the Court, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate that the telephonic
26 case management conference currently set for September 18, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., be continued until
27 October 2, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., and that the parties’ deadline to submit a joint case management statement
28 be extended from September 11, 2014 until September 25, 2014.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC
C13-1593 SBA
1
1
Plaintiff has sued defendant, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), for
2 alleged violation of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. In the parties’ last Joint
3 Case Management Statement, filed on June 19, 2014, the parties informed the Court that ICE agreed to
4 conduct several searches described in the parties’ February 25, 2014 stipulation (see ECF No. 33), and
5 that ICE had begun a rolling production of documents.
6
ICE completed its production on August 29, 2014. At this time, the parties anticipate that the
7 issues in this case will be challenges to the withholdings/exemptions under the FOIA claimed by
8 defendant in productions made from the searches described in the parties’ February 25, 2014 stipulation,
9 and that those challenges will be resolved on summary judgment.
10
The parties request a short continuance of the case management conference because plaintiff is
11 currently in the process of reviewing documents provided by defendant to determine what, if any,
12 withholdings/exemptions plaintiff intends to challenge. Plaintiff expects to complete its review by
13 September 22, 2014. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the telephonic case management
14 conference currently set for September 18, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., be continued to October 2, 2014 at 2:30
15 p.m. to allow the parties additional time to determine what, if any, issues remain for summary judgment.
16
17 DATED: September 10, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
18
/s/
JENNIFER S WANG
Assistant United States Attorney
19
20
21
22 DATED: September 10, 2014
National Day Laborer Organizing Network
23
/s/________
JESSICA KARP BANSAL
Attorneys for Plaintiff Asian Law Caucus
24
25
ORDER
26
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ordered that
27
the telephonic case management conference currently set for September 18, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. is
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC
C13-1593 SBA
2
1 continued to October 2, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. The parties will file a case management statement by
2 September 25, 2014.
3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
____________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC
C13-1593 SBA
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?