Asian Law Caucus v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al

Filing 38

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 37 Stipulation TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 MELINDA HAAG (CSBN 132612) United States Attorney 2 ALEX G. TSE (CSBN 152348) Chief, Civil Division 3 JENNIFER S WANG (CSBN 233155) Assistant United States Attorney 4 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 5 Telephone: (415) 436-6967 FAX: (415) 436-6748 6 jennifer.s.wang@usdoj.gov 7 Attorneys for Federal Defendants 8 JESSICA KARP BANSAL (CA BAR NO. 277347) 9 UC Irvine Immigrant Rights Clinic c/o National Day Laborer Organizing Network 10 675 S. Park View St. Los Angeles, CA 90057 11 Tel: (213) 380-2214 Fax: (213) 380-2787 12 jkarp@ndlon.org 13 Attorney for Plaintiff 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 ASIAN LAW CAUCUS, 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 21 22 23 UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 13-1593 SBA STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong Defendants. 24 25 Subject to the approval of the Court, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate that the telephonic 26 case management conference currently set for September 18, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., be continued until 27 October 2, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., and that the parties’ deadline to submit a joint case management statement 28 be extended from September 11, 2014 until September 25, 2014. STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC C13-1593 SBA 1 1 Plaintiff has sued defendant, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), for 2 alleged violation of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. In the parties’ last Joint 3 Case Management Statement, filed on June 19, 2014, the parties informed the Court that ICE agreed to 4 conduct several searches described in the parties’ February 25, 2014 stipulation (see ECF No. 33), and 5 that ICE had begun a rolling production of documents. 6 ICE completed its production on August 29, 2014. At this time, the parties anticipate that the 7 issues in this case will be challenges to the withholdings/exemptions under the FOIA claimed by 8 defendant in productions made from the searches described in the parties’ February 25, 2014 stipulation, 9 and that those challenges will be resolved on summary judgment. 10 The parties request a short continuance of the case management conference because plaintiff is 11 currently in the process of reviewing documents provided by defendant to determine what, if any, 12 withholdings/exemptions plaintiff intends to challenge. Plaintiff expects to complete its review by 13 September 22, 2014. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the telephonic case management 14 conference currently set for September 18, 2014 at 2:30 p.m., be continued to October 2, 2014 at 2:30 15 p.m. to allow the parties additional time to determine what, if any, issues remain for summary judgment. 16 17 DATED: September 10, 2014 Respectfully submitted, MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 18 /s/ JENNIFER S WANG Assistant United States Attorney 19 20 21 22 DATED: September 10, 2014 National Day Laborer Organizing Network 23 /s/________ JESSICA KARP BANSAL Attorneys for Plaintiff Asian Law Caucus 24 25 ORDER 26 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ordered that 27 the telephonic case management conference currently set for September 18, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. is 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC C13-1593 SBA 2 1 continued to October 2, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. The parties will file a case management statement by 2 September 25, 2014. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 ____________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC C13-1593 SBA 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?