Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund et al v. Kim et al
Filing
12
ORDER re 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 4 ADR Scheduling Order Stiplation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Stephen J. Mack, Automotive In dustries Pension Trust Fund, Chris Christophersen, James H. Beno, Jon Roselle, Douglas Cornford, Bill Brunelli, Don Crosatto, Mark Hollibush Case Management Statement due by 10/1/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/8/2013 01:30 PM.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/10/2013. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2013)
1 PHILIP M. MILLER (SBN 87877)
pmiller@sjlawcorp.com
2 KIMBERLY A. HANCOCK (SBN 205567)
khancock@sjlawcorp.com
3 JULIE A. RICHARDSON (SBN 215202)
jrichardson@sjlawcorp.com
4 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
5 San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 882-7900
6 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION
11 TRUST FUND, JAMES H. BENO, Trustee,
BILL BRUNELLI, Trustee, STEPHEN J.
12 MACK, Trustee, CHRIS CHRISTOPHERSEN,
Trustee, DON CROSATTO, Trustee, MARK
13 HOLLIBUSH, Trustee, JON ROSELLE,
Trustee, DOUGLAS CORNFORD, Trustee,
14 and JAMES V. CANTERBURY, Trustee,
15
16
Case No.: C 13-01597 KAW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
v.
JAE JUNG KIM dba TRI-CITY BODY &
17 PAINT; TRI-CITY BODY & PAINT, INC., a
California Corporation; and DOES 1-20,
18
Defendants.
19
20
Date: July 9, 2013
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor
Magistrate Judge: Kandis A. Westmore
The parties have stipulated to a 90-day continuance of the Initial Case Management
21 Conference currently scheduled for July 9, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor of this
22 Court, and all related case management and ADR deadlines, and seek the Court’s approval for
23 same. The parties have further stipulated to a 60-day extension of Defendants’ deadline to
24 respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, which is currently set for June 19, 2013, and seek the Court’s
25 approval for same.
26
1.
Good Cause exists for the request:
This action arises under the Employee
27 Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension
28 Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (29 U.S.C §§1001-1461 (1982)), to recover withdrawal liability
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No.: 13-01597 KAW
P:\CLIENTS\AUTPF\W\CASES\Tri-City\Pleadings\CMC\Stipulation to Continue CMC 06-06-13.DOC
1 amounts allegedly owed by defendants Jae Jung Kim and Tri-City Body & Paint, Inc.,
2 (“Defendants”) to plaintiffs Automotive Industries Pension Trust Fund and its Trustees
3 (“Plaintiffs”).
4
2.
On April 9, 2013, plaintiffs filed a Complaint in this matter.
5
3.
Defendants have been served and have appeared in the action as follows:
6
Jae Jung Kim dba Tri-City Body & Paint was served on April 29, 2013. (Dkt. 7)
7
Tri-City Body & Pain, Inc., a California Corporation, was served on April 29,
8 2013. (Dkt. 8)
4.
9
On May 16, 2013, the parties stipulated to a 30-day extension to June 19, 2013 for
10 Defendants to respond to the Complaint.
5.
11
The reason for the request is that the parties wish to have time to attempt a
12 cooperative resolution before incurring the fees involved in preparing for case management and
13 responding to the Complaint. In the interest of minimizing costs as well as attorney’s fees and the
14 Court’s time and resources, the parties would like to take the opportunity to attempt a settlement.
6.
15
Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the Case Management Conference
16 currently scheduled for July 9, 2013, and all of its associated deadlines, be continued for 90 days.
7.
17
No previous requests to change these dates have been submitted. The changes will
18 not affect any other deadline on the Court’s calendar.
8.
19
The parties also respectfully request that the Court further extend Defendants’ time
20 to respond to the Complaint by 60 days, to August 18, 2013. Because August 18, 2013 is a
21 Sunday, Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be August 19, 2013.
9.
22
On May 16, 2013, the parties stipulated to a 30-day extension of Defendants’ time
23 to respond to the Complaint. This further extension will not affect any other deadline on the
24 Court’s calendar.
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No.: 13-01597 KAW
P:\CLIENTS\AUTPF\W\CASES\Tri-City\Pleadings\CMC\Stipulation to Continue CMC 06-06-13.DOC
1
Dated: June 10, 2013
2
/s/ SEAN T. STRAUSS
SEAN T. STRAUSS
TRUCKERHUSS
Attorneys for Defendants
JAE JUNG KIM
TRI-CITY BODY & PAINT, INC.
3
4
5
6 Dated: June 10, 2013
7
8
9
/s/ JULIE RICHARDSON
JULIE RICHARDSON
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION TRUST
FUND
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No.: 13-01597 KAW
P:\CLIENTS\AUTPF\W\CASES\Tri-City\Pleadings\CMC\Stipulation to Continue CMC 06-06-13.DOC
1
2
ORDER
1.
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
3 continues the Initial Case Management Conference in this action from its currently scheduled date
4 of July 9, 2013 to October 8, 2013. All other related case management and ADR deadlines are
5 continued accordingly.
6
2.
Furthermore, the Court hereby extends Defendants deadline to respond to
7 Plaintiffs’ Complaint to August 19, 2013.
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Date: June 10, 2013
11
12
________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; Case No.: 13-01597 KAW
P:\CLIENTS\AUTPF\W\CASES\Tri-City\Pleadings\CMC\Stipulation to Continue CMC 06-06-13.DOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?