Marotz v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 101

ORDER TAKING MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 92 UNDER SUBMISSION WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/05/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
WILLIAM LEON MAROTZ,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),
v.

14

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL,

15

No. C-13-01677 DMR
ORDER TAKING MOTION TO
DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT [DOCKET NO. 92]
UNDER SUBMISSION WITHOUT
ORAL ARGUMENT

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17
18

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The court has received Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint,

19

Docket No. 92, and finds that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument pursuant

20

to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the June 26, 2014 hearing on the motion is hereby

21

VACATED. The court will issue a written order on the motion.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: June 5, 2014

26
27
28

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge