Marotz v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 108

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE APPELLATE MATTERS IN APPELLATE COURT. Motions terminated: 107 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by William Leon Marotz.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 07/08/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
WILLIAM LEON MAROTZ,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),
v.

14

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE APPELLATE MATTERS IN
APPELLATE COURT

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL,

15

No. C-13-01677 DMR

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

On June 17, 2014, this court dismissed the case. [Docket No. 103.] Plaintiff appealed. See
9th Cir. Case No. 14-16210. On June 26, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Clerk of the Court issued an order
noting that Plaintiff had not paid the docketing and filing fees for his appeal, and requiring Plaintiff
to “(1) file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) pay $505 to the district court as
the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and provide proof of payment to this court; or (3)
otherwise show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.” See id. at
Docket No. 3-1.
Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis with the undersigned court on June
30, 2014. [Docket No. 107.] This is improper; the document must be filed with the Ninth Circuit,
not this court. In this instance, the undersigned will forward Plaintiff’s application to the Ninth
Circuit and terminate the application in this court. The undersigned notifies Plaintiff that all future
filings related to Plaintiff’s appeal must be filed with the Ninth Circuit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 8, 2014
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge