IPVX Patent Holdings, Inc. v. 8x8, Inc.

Filing 91

ORDER. Set Deadlines as to 73 MOTION to Dismiss: Responses due by 2/11/2014. Replies due by 2/18/2014. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 1/27/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OAKLAND DIVISION 7 IPVX PATENT HOLDINGS, INC., a Case No: C 13-01707 SBA 8 Delaware corporation, ORDER Plaintiff, 9 Docket 73 10 vs. 11 8X8, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On August 20, 2013, Defendant filed a motion to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel and a motion to dismiss. Dkt. 71, 73. On August 21, 2013, the Court issued an order referring Defendant’s motion to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel to the Chief Magistrate Judge or her designee for determination. Dkt. 75. On that same day, the Court also issued a minute order stating that Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be held in abeyance pending a ruling on Defendant’s motion to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel. Dkt. 76. The motion to disqualify Plaintiff’s counsel was subsequently assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore (“Magistrate Westmore”). See Dkt. 82. On December 19, 2013, Magistrate Westmore issued an order denying Defendant’s motion to disqualify. Dkt. 90. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss by no later than February 11, 2014. 2. Defendant may file a reply by no later than February 18, 2014. 3. After the briefing on the motion is complete, the Court will take the matter under submission without oral argument. 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/27/2014 3 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?