Ward et al v. Pickett et al

Filing 65

ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 62 . The court has already granted Plaintiffs leave to amend certain claims. See Docket No. 59 . The motion is therefore denied as moot with respect to the request t o amend the claims. The parties are ordered to meet and confer as to whether there are any objections to Plaintiffs adding Mike Pickett as a party defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/21/13. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
CHARLES E. WARD, ET AL.,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),
v.

14

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE REVISED FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT [DOCKET
NO. 62]

GREGORY ALAN PICKETT, ET AL.,

15

No. C-13-01735 DMR

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

The court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a revised first amended

18

complaint. [Docket No. 62.] The court has already granted Plaintiffs leave to amend certain claims

19

in an order dated October 3, 2013. See Docket No. 59. The motion is therefore denied as moot

20

with respect to the request to amend the claims. Plaintiffs shall file their revised first amended

21

complaint so long as it is consistent with the October 3 order.

22

In addition, Plaintiffs move for leave to add Mike Pickett as a party defendant. The parties

23

are ordered to meet and confer as to whether there are any objections to Plaintiffs doing so. If there

24

are not, Defendants must file a statement of non-opposition to this aspect of the motion by October

25

31, 2013. See Civil L.R. 7-3(b).

26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2013
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge