Dimond Internet Services, LLC v. County of Alameda
Filing
7
ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE re 5 Stipulation filed by County of Alameda. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/22/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Thomas F. Bertrand, State Bar No. 056560
Michael C. Wenzel, State Bar No. 215388
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
The Waterfront Building
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone:
(415) 353-0999
Facsimile:
(415) 353-0990
Email:
mwenzel@bfesf.com
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
H. Clyde Long, State Bar No. 102148
LONG LAW OFFICES
950 Risa Road, 2nd Floor
Lafayette, CA 94549
Telephone:
(925) 284-5575
Facsimile:
(925) 284-5659
Email:
clyde@longlawoffices.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DIMOND INTERNET SERVICES LLC
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
DIMOND INTERNET SERVICES, LLC, a
California limited liability company,
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 4:13-cv-01893-PJH
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING
DEADLINE
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
Defendant.
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
Dimond Internet Services v. County of Alameda
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. 4:13-cv-01893-PJH
1
2
3
4
5
1.
Plaintiff DIMOND INTERNET SERVICES LLC filed a Complaint against defendant
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA on April 25, 2013, and served the Complaint May 1, 2013.
2.
Defendant’s responsive pleading is therefore due May 22, 2013—21 days after the
Complaint was served.
3.
On May 10, 2013, plaintiff filed a Motion to Relate Cases in Net Connection, LLC, et al.
6
v. County of Alameda (N.D. Cal. No. C13-1467 SI) to consider whether the instant case and Net
7
Connection should be deemed “related.” That motion remains pending.
8
9
10
11
12
4.
A hearing for a Temporary Restraining Order in Net Connection took place on April 17,
2013. To date, no decision on the Temporary Restraining Order application has been issued.
5.
On May 1, 2013, defendant in Net Connections filed a motion to dismiss, which is
scheduled to be heard on June 21, 2013.
6.
Because the Temporary Restraining Order application in Net Connections and Motion to
13
Relate Cases are pending, the Parties respectfully requested that the Court continue defendant’s
14
responsive pleading deadline from May 22, 2013 to June 26, 2013.
15
ORDER
16
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, the Parties having stipulated to the same, the
17
Parties’ Stipulated Request To Continue Defendant’s Responsive Pleading Deadline is hereby
18
APPROVED. Defendant’s responsive pleading deadline shall be continued until June 26, 2013.
19
DATED: May 22
, 2013
ER
Hamilton
A
H
23
hyllis J.
LI
RT
Judge P
FO
NO
22
R NIA
Phyllis J. Hamilton
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNIT
ED
21
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
20
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
Dimond Internet Services v. County of Alameda
U.S.D.C. Northern District of CA Case No. 4:13-cv-01893-PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?