Richardson v. Fluor Corporation

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/26/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Benjamin Elliot Kaplan, SBN 43456
[e-mail]
Douglas Cameron MacLellan, SBN 169933
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICES OF KAPLAN & MACLELLAN
601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2090
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TIMOTHY RAY RICHARDSON
Thomas M. McInerney, SBN 162055
[e-mail]
Jill V. Cartwright, SBN 260519
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
FLUOR CORPORATION and
FLUOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC.

18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION

21
22

TIMOTHY RAY RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,

23
24

v.

25
26
27
28

FLUOR CORPORATION; FLUOR
MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC.;
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. CV-13-1908-SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING
ADR PROCESS

Case No. CV-13-1908-SBA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1
2

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

3

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

4

Court Processes:

5

☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

6

☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

7
8
9
10
11
12

 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably
more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone
conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone
Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

13
14

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

15

 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

16

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

17

☐ other requested deadline _____________________________________________

18
19

Dated: July 26, 2013

LAW OFFICES OF KAPLAN & MACLELLAN
By:
/s/ Douglas C. MacLellan
Douglas Cameron MacLellan
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TIMOTHY RAY RICHARDSON

Dated: July 26, 2013

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
By:
/s/ Jill V. Cartwright
Thomas M. McInerney
Jill V. Cartwright
Attorneys for Defendants
FLUOR CORPORATION and
FLUOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. CV-13-1908-SBA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

page 1

ORDER

1
2

X

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

☐ The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: 7/26/13
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

12
13

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
has been obtained from the other signatories.

14
15

DATED: July 29, 2013

16
17

By: /s/ Jill V. Cartwright
Jill V. Cartwright

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. CV-13-1908-SBA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

page 2