Crane v. Wells Fargo
Filing
37
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 8/20/2013.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on August 6, 2013. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
BARBARA CRANE,
9
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 4:13-cv-1932 KAW
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
10
v.
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
WELLS FARGO, N.A.,
Defendant.
13
14
15
Plaintiff Barbara Crane is proceeding in this case without an attorney. Defendant filed motion
16
to dismiss the first amended complaint on July 2, 2013. Dkt # 28. The motion is currently set for
17
hearing on September 5, 2013.
18
According to the Court's local rules, Plaintiff should have filed an opposition to Defendant's
19
motion by July 16. See Civil Local Rule 7-3. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.
20
The September 5, 2013 hearing on the motion to dismiss is hereby VACATED. The Court
21
ORDERS Plaintiff to, within 14 days of this order, show cause why her case should not be dismissed
22
for failure to prosecute, and file her opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non23
opposition to the motion.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
1
Failure to comply with this order may result in Defendant's motion to dismiss being granted,
2
or in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute. See Magistrate Judge Westmore's General
3
Standing Order, ΒΆ 21 ("The failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and
4
authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion").
5
It is so ORDERED.
6
7
DATE: August 6, 2013
___________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?