The Clorox Company et al v. Mavea LLC

Filing 52

ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL re 51 Notice of Substitution of Counsel, filed by The Clorox Company, The Clorox Sales Company, Brita LP, The Brita Products Company. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/6/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 THE CLOROX COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; BRITA LP, a Canadian Limited Partnership; THE BRITA PRODUCTS COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation; THE CLOROX SALES COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, 18 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’/COUNTER-DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, 16 17 Case No. 4:13-CV-01933-YGR v. MAVEA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendant/Counter-Claimant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Notice of Substitution and Withdrawal of Counsel Case No. 13-cv-01933-YGR 1 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ and Counter-Defendants’, The 2 Clorox Company, Brita LP, The Brita Products Company, and The Clorox Sales Company, 3 Notice of Substitution and Withdrawal of Counsel. The Court having reviewed and considered 4 Plaintiffs’ Notice of Substitution and Withdrawal of Counsel, hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Notice 5 of Substitution and Withdrawal of Counsel pursuant to Local Rule 11-5. 6 7 8 9 March 6 Dated: _________________ , 2014 By: _________________________________ Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RENT F OX LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Notice of Substitution and Withdrawal of Counsel Case No. 13-cv-01933-YGR 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?