Sumera v. Holder et al

Filing 15

ORDER re 14 Certificate of Service filed by Ruben Sumera. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on December 17, 2013. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 United States District Court Northern District of California 3 4 5 6 RUBEN SUMERA, Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 ERIC HOLDER, et al., Case No.: CV 13-01950-KAW ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Defendants. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Plaintiff commenced the above-captioned case against Eric H. Holder, David Gaschke, 12 13 and Laura Nicolosi on April 29, 2013. (Compl., Dkt. No. 1.) On October 4, 2013, this court 14 ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 15 (Oct. 1, 2013 Order to Show Cause, Dkt. No. 10.) In the order, the court noted that while it had 16 granted Plaintiff an extension of time to serve the defendants, the extended deadline for serving 17 the defendants had passed without Plaintiff filing proof of service of the summons and complaint. 18 (Id.) The extended deadline for serving the defendants was August 31, 2013. (Id.) Plaintiff was 19 to file a written response to the order to show cause by Friday, October 18, 2013 at 5:00 p.m. 20 (Id.) 21 Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause on October 18, 2013 at 10:36 p.m. 22 (Pl.'s Response, Dkt. No. 11.) The court noted that Plaintiff's response was insufficient. (October 23 25, 2013 Order re Pl.'s Response at 1, Dkt. No. 12.) In the response, Plaintiff indicated that 24 defendants were served on September 18, 2013 and that he would file proof of service upon 25 receipt from the process server. (Pl.'s Response at 1.) 26 On October 25, 2013, the court ordered Plaintiff to promptly file proof of service of the 27 summons and complaint. (October 25, 2013 Order re Pl.'s Response at 1.) In that order, the court 28 put counsel on notice that it would not discharge the order to show cause until after Plaintiff filed 1 proof of service of the summons and complaint, which Plaintiff was to file by December 4, 2013. 2 (Id.) Plaintiff filed proof of service of the summons and complaint on December 4, 2013, 3 however, the filing shows only that the summons and complaint was personally delivered to the 4 agent for service of process for the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the 5 Northern District of California. Plaintiff has not filed any proof of service showing that Eric H. 6 Holder, David Gaschke, and Laura Nicolosi have been served in this action. Accordingly, the 7 court hereby orders that Plaintiff file proof of service of the summons and complaint showing that 8 all of these defendants have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). 9 Plaintiff shall file such proof of service by January 3, 2014. 10 As this is the court's third order requiring Plaintiff to file proof of service of the summons United States District Court Northern District of California 11 and complaint, if Plaintiff fails to adhere to the January 3, 2014 deadline, the court will dismiss 12 this case for failure to prosecute. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 17, 2013 ___________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?