Lemons v. Unknown

Filing 11

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's IFP application (Docket No. 9) is DENIED as incomplete. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment, terminate all pending motions, and close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/17/13. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 v. D. LEWIS, et al., Defendants. 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff, 8 10 No. C 13-02110 DMR (PR) DARNELL EDWARD LEMONS, / This action was opened on May 8, 2013, when the Court received from Inmate Darnell Edward Lemons a letter that concerned prison conditions at Pelican Bay State Prison ("PBSP"). On the same date, the Clerk of the Court notified Plaintiff in writing that his action was 13 deficient in that he had not submitted his complaint on the proper complaint form and had not 14 submitted an in forma pauperis ("IFP") application. The Clerk further notified him that this action 15 would be dismissed if he did not submit a complaint on the proper form and a completed IFP 16 application within twenty-eight days. 17 18 19 On May 10, 2013, the Clerk notified Plaintiff in writing that this matter had been assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. On May 22, 2013, Plaintiff consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. 20 However, he did not submit a complaint on the proper form. Nor did he file a completed IFP 21 application. 22 On June 20, 2013, the Clerk sent another notice informing Plaintiff that this action would be 23 dismissed if he did not submit a complaint on the proper form and a completed IFP application 24 within twenty-eight days. 25 On July 11, 2013, Plaintiff submitted his pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 26 on the proper form. Plaintiff also filed a completed IFP application form; however, his certificate of 27 funds was not signed by an authorized PBSP officer and he did not file a copy of his prisoner trust 28 account statement. 1 On August 14, 2013, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that his IFP application was deficient due to 2 his failure to include the necessary documents in support of his application. The Clerk further 3 informed Plaintiff that his action could not go forward until he filed the necessary documents within 4 twenty-eight days, and that his failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. 5 6 7 More than twenty-eight days have passed and Plaintiff has not submitted his certificate of funds or his prisoner trust account statement. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's IFP 8 application (Docket No. 9) is DENIED as incomplete. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment, 9 terminate all pending motions, and close the file. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 17, 2013 12 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\DMR\CR.13\Lemons2110.DISIFP.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?