Leevan v. Credit Suisse International et al

Filing 70

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 10/21/2014. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 Hal Cunningham SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP 2 707 Broadway, Suite 1000 3 San Diego, California 92101 Tel.: (619) 233-4565 4 Fax: (619) 233-0508 Email: hcunningham@scott-scott.com 5 6 Thomas L. Laughlin IV Deborah Clark-Weintraub 7 SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP The Chrysler Building 8 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10174 9 Tel: (212) 223-6444 10 Fax: (212) 223-6334 Email: tlaughlin@scott-scott.com dweintraub@scott-scott.com 11 12 Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs [Additional counsel on signature page.] 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 WILLARD A. SHARRETTE, DAVID 17 GOLDMAN, and ESTA GOLDMAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others 18 Similarly Situated, 19 20 Plaintiffs, v. 21 CREDIT SUISSE INTERNATIONAL, a foreign company; CREDIT SUISSE 22 SECURITIES (USA) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1-100, 23 24 Case No. 4:13-cv-02783-SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) 4:13-cv-02783-SBA 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs hereby submit this Stipulation and 2 [Proposed] Order to Transfer this Action to the Southern District of New York Pursuant to 28 3 U.S.C. §1404(a). 4 WHEREAS, on June 17, 2013, the above-captioned action was filed with this Court (ECF 5 No. 1); 6 WHEREAS, on December 5, 2013, this Court appointed Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel 7 in this Action (ECF No. 43); 8 WHEREAS, on February 3, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint 9 (ECF No. 48); 10 WHEREAS, between April 4, 2014 and July 10, 2014, the Parties to this action fully 11 briefed Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (see ECF Nos. 53-55, 58, and 65); 12 WHEREAS, on October 15, 2014, this Court entered an Order to Show Cause as to why 13 this case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of 14 New York (ECF No. 68); 15 WHEREAS, in its Order to Show Cause, the Court directed that “[a]lternatively, the 16 parties may file a stipulation requesting that this case be transferred to the Southern District of 17 New York under § 1404(a)”; and 18 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agree that this case should be transferred to 19 the Southern District of New York; 20 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by all parties through 21 their respective counsel of record, that: 22 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a), this action shall be transferred to the United 23 States District Court for the Southern District of New York. 24 25 STIPULATED AND AGREED TO: 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) 4:13-cv-02783-SBA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DATED: October 21, 2014 SCOTT+SCOTT, Attorneys at Law, LLP By: /s/ Thomas L. Laughlin IV Thomas L. Laughlin IV Deborah-Clark Weintraub SCOTT+SCOTT, Attorneys at Law, LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10174 Tel: (212) 223-6444 Fax: (212) 223-6334 Email: tlaughlin@scott-scott.com dweintraub@scott-scott.com 8 9 10 11 12 Stephen J. Teti SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP 156 South Main Street P.O. Box 192 Colchester, CT 06415 Tel: (860) 537-5537 Fax: (860) 537-4432 Email: steti@scott-scott.com 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hal Cunningham SCOTT+SCOTT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP 707 Broadway, Suite 1000 San Diego, California 92101 Tel.: (619) 233-4565 Fax: (619) 233-0508 Email: hcunningham@scott-scott.com LEWIS & ROBERTS, PLLC Gary V. Mauney James A. Robert III One Southpark Center 6060 Piedmont Row Drive South, Suite 140 Charlotte, NC 28287 Tel: (704) 347-8990 Fax: (704) 347-8929 Email: garymauney@lewis-roberts.com JimRoberts@lewis-roberts.com 24 Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) 4:13-cv-02783-SBA 1 DATED: October 21, 2014 2 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP By: /s/ Allison S. Davidson Allison S. Davidson (267964) Patrick E. Gibbs (183174) 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, California 94025 Tel: (650) 470-4600 Fax: (415) 534-3200 Email: patrick.gibbs@lw.com allison.davidson@lw.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 Counsel for Credit Suisse International and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC 9 10 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: October 21, 2014 ____________________________________ HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) 4:13-cv-02783-SBA 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 21, 2014, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed 3 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 4 to the email addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail Notice List. 5 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 6 foregoing is true and correct. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Executed this 21st day of October, 2014 at New York, New York. /s/ Thomas L. Laughlin Thomas L. Laughlin SCOTT+SCOTT, Attorneys at Law, LLP The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10174 Tel: (212) 223-6444 Fax: (212) 223-6334 Email: tlaughlin@scott-scott.com 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO TRANSFER ACTION TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) 4:13-cv-02783-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?