Thomas v. Del Biaggio, III et al
Filing
46
ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING REGARDING THOMVEST'S MOTION RE: BILL OF COSTS. Compliance Hearing regarding non-movants' position on Thomvest's Motion is set for Friday, 1/9/2015 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/16/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ROBERT J. THOMAS,
Case No.: 13-CV-2794 YGR
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING
REGARDING THOMVEST’S MOTION RE: BILL
OF COSTS
9
WILLIAM J. DEL. BIAGGIO, III, ET AL.,
10
11
Defendants.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
The Court, having reviewed Thomvest’s motion regarding bill of costs (Dkt. No. 43) and
14
finding no statement in response thereof, hereby requests an affirmative statement by the non-moving
15
parties as to whether they oppose or do not oppose said motion.
16
Accordingly, a compliance hearing regarding non-movants’ position on Thomvest’s motion
17
shall be held on Friday, January 9, 2015 on the Court’s 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal Courthouse,
18
1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1.
19
Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the non-movants shall file
20
either: (a) statement of non-opposition or an opposition to said motion; or (b) a one-page statement
21
setting forth an explanation for their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar.
Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 16, 2014
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?