Riverbed Technology, Inc. v. Silver Peak Systems, Inc.

Filing 90

ORDER GRANTING 89 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 6/16/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2015)

Case4:13-cv-02980-JSW Document89-1 Filed06/15/15 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER (CSB No. 191605)
[e-mail]
BRYAN A. KOHM (CSB No. 233276)
[e-mail]
LAUREN E. WHITTEMORE (CSB No. 255432)
[e-mail]
WILLIAM A. MOSELEY (CSB No. 278740)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.875.2300
Facsimile:
415.281.1350
Attorneys for Defendant
SILVER PEAK SYSTEMS, INC.

9

Matthew B. Lehr (SBN 213139)
Anthony I. Fenwick (SBN 158667)
Gareth E. DeWalt (SBN 261479)
Igor Piryazev (SBN 253149)
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.

10

SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15

RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

16
17
18

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. CV-13-2980
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

v.
SILVER PEAK SYSTEMS, INC,

19

Defendant.

20
21

In consideration of Plaintiff Riverbed Technology, Inc.’s and Defendant Silver Peak

22

Systems, Inc.’s Joint Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice all claims and counterclaims between

23

Plaintiff Riverbed Technology and Defendant Silver Peak Systems, Inc., it is ORDERED,

24

ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and counterclaims asserted in this suit between

25

Plaintiff Riverbed Technology and Defendant Silver Peak Systems, Inc. are hereby dismissed

26

with prejudice.

27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

CASE NO. CV-13-2980

Case4:13-cv-02980-JSW Document89-1 Filed06/15/15 Page2 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs are to be borne by the
party that incurred them.
SO ORDERED.
June 16, 2015
Dated: _______________

__________________________________
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT

6
7
8
9
10

SAN FRANCISCO

12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

2

CASE NO. CV-13-2980