A.B. v. McKesson Corporation et al

Filing 15

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by the MDL Panel on 8/20/2013. (vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013)

Download PDF
--- -------------------------- UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: EFFEXOR (VENLAFAXINE HYDROCHLORIDE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2458 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -1) On August 6, 2013, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M Rufe. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Judge Rufe. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Liti~atjon, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of August 6, 2013, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M Rufe. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Aug 20,2013 CLERK'S OFFICE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Jeffery N. LUthi Clerk of the Panel IN RE: EFFEXOR (VENLAFAXINE HYDROCHLORIDE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2458 SCHEDULE CT0-1- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL 13 05043 J.K. B. et al v Pfil'ler lne e~ al Opposed 8/19/13 CALIFORNIA EASTERN 13 01401 R. et al Y. Pfil'lef, Iae. Opposed 8/19/13 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN tAN ; CAN CAN 4 4 13 03226 13-03037 13-03039 J.M.J. et al v. Pfil'ler, Iae. et al Opposed 8/19/13 E. et al v. Pfizer, Inc. A.B. v. McKesson Corporation et at CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN 6T\& CAS 6T\& ; 3 ; 13 01674 13-01675 13 01686 K.P.P. et al v. Pfil'ler, lae. et al M.M.R. et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et at LC.V. et al v. Pfil'Jer, Iae. et al Opposed 8/19/13 Opposed 8/19/13 NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13-03340 13-03341 13-03342 13-03343 13-03344 13-03345 13-03346 13-03347 13-03348 13-03349 13-03351 13-03352 13-03353 Thrall et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al Montero et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al Reed et al v. Pfizer Inc et al Rodgers et al v. Pfizer Inc et al Covert et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al Gear et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al Young-Ghiorso et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al Seitz et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al Browning v. Pfizer Inc. et al Dolloffv. PFizer Inc., et al Houchin et al v. Pfizer Inc., et al Foresman v. Pfizer, Inc. et al Stutz et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS NYS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13-03354 13-03355 13-03356 13-03357 13-03358 13-03359 13-03360 13-03361 13-03362 13-03363 13-03365 Taylor v. Pfizer Inc. et al Jones v. Pfizer, Inc. et al Chancey v. Pfizer Inc., et al Sanchez eta! v. Pfizer Inc., et al Bonds v. Ptizer Inc et al Windsor et al v. Pfizer Inc et a1 Ricks et al v. Pfizer Inc et al Dilling v. Pfizer Inc et al Kauffman et al v. Pfizer Inc et al Oller et al v. Pfizer Inc et al Strickland v. Pfizer Inc et al PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE PAM 3 13-01778 Burridge v. Wyeth Pham1aceuticals, Inc. et al

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?