A.B. v. McKesson Corporation et al
Filing
15
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by the MDL Panel on 8/20/2013. (vlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2013)
---
--------------------------
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: EFFEXOR (VENLAFAXINE
HYDROCHLORIDE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2458
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -1)
On August 6, 2013, the Panel transferred 4 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2013). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that court, all such actions
have been assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M Rufe.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and assigned to
Judge Rufe.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Liti~atjon, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of August 6, 2013, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M Rufe.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk
shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk
of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
Inasmuch as no objection is
pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Aug 20,2013
CLERK'S OFFICE
UNITED STATES
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Jeffery N. LUthi
Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: EFFEXOR (VENLAFAXINE
HYDROCHLORIDE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION
MDL No. 2458
SCHEDULE CT0-1- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
13 05043
J.K. B. et al v Pfil'ler lne
e~
al
Opposed 8/19/13
CALIFORNIA EASTERN
13 01401
R. et al
Y.
Pfil'lef, Iae.
Opposed 8/19/13
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
tAN
;
CAN
CAN
4
4
13 03226
13-03037
13-03039
J.M.J. et al v. Pfil'ler, Iae. et al Opposed 8/19/13
E. et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
A.B. v. McKesson Corporation et at
CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN
6T\&
CAS
6T\&
;
3
;
13 01674
13-01675
13 01686
K.P.P. et al v. Pfil'ler, lae. et al
M.M.R. et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et at
LC.V. et al v. Pfil'Jer, Iae. et al
Opposed 8/19/13
Opposed 8/19/13
NEW YORK SOUTHERN
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13-03340
13-03341
13-03342
13-03343
13-03344
13-03345
13-03346
13-03347
13-03348
13-03349
13-03351
13-03352
13-03353
Thrall et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
Montero et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
Reed et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
Rodgers et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
Covert et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
Gear et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
Young-Ghiorso et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
Seitz et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
Browning v. Pfizer Inc. et al
Dolloffv. PFizer Inc., et al
Houchin et al v. Pfizer Inc., et al
Foresman v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
Stutz et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
NYS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13-03354
13-03355
13-03356
13-03357
13-03358
13-03359
13-03360
13-03361
13-03362
13-03363
13-03365
Taylor v. Pfizer Inc. et al
Jones v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
Chancey v. Pfizer Inc., et al
Sanchez eta! v. Pfizer Inc., et al
Bonds v. Ptizer Inc et al
Windsor et al v. Pfizer Inc et a1
Ricks et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
Dilling v. Pfizer Inc et al
Kauffman et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
Oller et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
Strickland v. Pfizer Inc et al
PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE
PAM
3
13-01778
Burridge v. Wyeth Pham1aceuticals, Inc. et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?