Hampton et al v. City Of Oakland et al
Filing
79
ORDER Setting Emergency Telephonic Case Management Conference. Case Management Conference set for 9/19/2014 11:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/17/2014. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
FRED HAMPTON JR., ET AL.,
12
13
Plaintiff(s),
v.
14
ORDER SETTING EMERGENCY
TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
CITY OF OAKLAND, ET AL.,
15
No. C-13-03094 DMR
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
The court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' motion to amend the pleadings (Docket No. 76) and
18
administrative motion to take Defendants' motions for summary judgment off calendar pending the
19
court's ruling on the motion to amend (Docket No. 78). It appears that the relief sought by Plaintiffs
20
may have some impact on the case schedule. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that lead
21
counsel for all parties shall participate in an emergency telephonic Case Management Conference on
22
September 19, 2014 at 11:00 a.m.
23
Counsel for Plaintiffs shall initiate the four-way conference call to the court as follows: (1)
24
by first calling counsel for Defendants City of Oakland and City of Emeryville; and then (2) with all
25
counsel on the line, calling the court at (510) 637-1007.
26
27
28
Plaintiffs are not relieved from their deadline for responding to the pending motions for
summary judgment.
7
8
9
10
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
M. Ryu
R NIA
onna
Judge D
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
RN
LI
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
E
H
6
RT
5
Dated: September 17, 2014
NO
4
A
3
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
FO
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
2
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?