Hampton et al v. City Of Oakland et al

Filing 90

ORDER re Chambers Copies of 66 MOTION for Summary Judgment Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Defendant City of Oakland's Motion for Summary Judgment, or, Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 and 56.) filed by City Of Oakland. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/30/2014. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
FRED HAMPTON JR., ET AL.,

12
13

Plaintiff(s),

No. C-13-03094 DMR
ORDER RE CHAMBERS COPIES

v.

14

CITY OF OAKLAND, ET AL.,

15

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the chambers copy of Defendant City of Oakland’s motion for

18

summary judgment and supporting documents (Docket Nos. 66, 68-75) was submitted in a format

19

that is not usable by the court.

20

The chambers copy is not usable because it

21

()

consists of a stack of loose paper wrapped with a rubber band;

22

()

consists of a stack of loose paper fastened with a binder clip or a paper clip;

23

()

is too thick to permit secure fastening with a staple, and is fastened with a

24

brad-type fastener that is too short for the thickness of the document;

25

(X)

has no tabs for the exhibits;

26

()

includes exhibits that are illegible;

27

()

includes exhibits that are unreadable because the print is too small;

28

()

includes text and/or footnotes in a font smaller than 12 point;

1

()

2

includes portions or exhibits that are redacted because the submitting party
has requested leave to file those portions under seal; or

3

()

4

The court has recycled the paper used for the above-described chambers copy. By no later

is not usable for another reason (__).

5

than October 1, 2014, Defendant City of Oakland shall submit a chambers copy of the document in

6

a format that is usable by the court. Specifically, each individual exhibit to each declaration filed in

7

support of the City of Oakland's motion for summary judgment shall be individually tabbed and

8

labeled.

14

United States Magistrate Judge

ER

H

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

R NIA

Ryu

FO

nna M.
DONNAdge RYU
u M. Do
J

LI

13

Dated: September 30, 2014

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

A

12

RT

For the Northern District of California

11

UNIT
ED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NO

United States District Court

10

RT
U
O

S

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C