Narog v. City of Redwood City et al

Filing 126

ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/13/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 6 7 CORY NARO OG, Case No. 1 13-cv-03237 7-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER 9 10 CITY OF RED DWOOD CI ITY, et al., Nos. 4 Re: Dkt. N 123, 124 Defendants s. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Defend dants filed a motion to str on Apri 23, 2015. [Docket No. 123.] Plain m rike il ntiff’s 14 res sponse was due on May 7, 2015, but Plaintiff did not file an opposition b that date. The court d 7 d by 15 issu an order requiring Plaintiff to sh cause fo his failure to oppose th motion, a to ued r P how or e he and 16 sim multaneously file any opp y position. [D Docket No. 124.] Plaintiff has filed a response to the order o 17 to show cause as well as hi opposition to the moti s is n ion. [Docket No. 124.] Defendants’ reply, if t ’ 18 any is due on May 20, 201 y, M 15. 19 20 21 22 The cou finds that the motion is appropria for resolu urt t ate ution withou oral argum ut ment pur rsuant to Civ Local Rule 7-1(b). A written ord will follo vil der ow. Immedi iately upon receipt of thi order, Pla r is aintiff’s coun shall ens nsel sure that Pla aintiff has rec ceived a copy y. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: May 13 2015 3, ___ __________ ___________ __________ ________ Donna M. Ryu Un nited States M Magistrate J Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?