Narog v. City of Redwood City et al
Filing
126
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/13/15. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
5
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
6
7
CORY NARO
OG,
Case No. 1
13-cv-03237
7-DMR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER
9
10
CITY OF RED
DWOOD CI
ITY, et al.,
Nos.
4
Re: Dkt. N 123, 124
Defendants
s.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Defend
dants filed a motion to str on Apri 23, 2015. [Docket No. 123.] Plain
m
rike
il
ntiff’s
14
res
sponse was due on May 7, 2015, but Plaintiff did not file an opposition b that date. The court
d
7
d
by
15
issu an order requiring Plaintiff to sh cause fo his failure to oppose th motion, a to
ued
r
P
how
or
e
he
and
16
sim
multaneously file any opp
y
position. [D
Docket No. 124.] Plaintiff has filed a response to the order
o
17
to show cause as well as hi opposition to the moti
s
is
n
ion. [Docket No. 124.] Defendants’ reply, if
t
’
18
any is due on May 20, 201
y,
M
15.
19
20
21
22
The cou finds that the motion is appropria for resolu
urt
t
ate
ution withou oral argum
ut
ment
pur
rsuant to Civ Local Rule 7-1(b). A written ord will follo
vil
der
ow.
Immedi
iately upon receipt of thi order, Pla
r
is
aintiff’s coun shall ens
nsel
sure that Pla
aintiff has
rec
ceived a copy
y.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: May 13 2015
3,
___
__________
___________
__________
________
Donna M. Ryu
Un
nited States M
Magistrate J
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?