Narog v. City of Redwood City et al

Filing 55

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 53 Stipulation.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2014)

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page1 of 14

1
2
3
4

JIVAKA CANDAPPA (SBN 225919)
739 East Walnut Street, Suite 204
Pasadena, CA 91101
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff CORY NAROG

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

JOSEPH C. HOWARD, JR. (SBN 050784)
[e-mail]
TODD H. MASTER (SBN 185881)
[e-mail]
HOWARD ROME MARTIN & RIDLEY LLP
1775 Woodside Road, Suite 200
Redwood City, CA 94061
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
(650) 364-529
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF REDWOOD CITY,
KENNETH FALJEAN, JOHN PAUL GARY, and VICTOR F. FIGUEROA

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

CORY NAROG,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, OFFICER
FIGUEROA (#387), OFFICER FALJEAN
(#309), OFFICER GARY, DOE 1 through
DOE 40, in their official and individual
capacities,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C13-3237 DMR
AMENDED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER:
PRODUCTION OF CONFIDENTIAL
RECORDS
Judge: Hon. Donna M. Ryu
Location: 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA
Courtroom: 4, 3rd Floor,
Complaint Filed: July 12, 2013

25
26

Plaintiff Cory Narog (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants City of Redwood City, Victor

27

Figueroa, Kenneth Faljean and John Gary (collectively “Defendants”), through their respective

28

attorneys of record, stipulate to the following protective order:
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-1-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page2 of 14

1

1.

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

2

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

3

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public

4

disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.

5

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following

6

Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket

7

protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from

8

public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to

9

confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as

10

set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to

11

file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that

12

must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the

13

court to file material under seal.

14

2.

15
16
17

DEFINITIONS
2.1

Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of

information or items under this Order.
2.2

“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is

18

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal

19

Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).

20
21
22
23
24

2.3

Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as

well as their support staff).
2.4

Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items

that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.5

Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the

25

medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other

26

things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures

27

or responses to discovery in this matter.

28
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-2-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page3 of 14

1

2.6

Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent

2

to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or

3

as a consultant in this action.
2.7

4
5

Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
2.8

6
7

Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other

legal entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.9

8
9

House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House

Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this

action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this

10

action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of

11

that party.
2.10

12
13

consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).
2.11

14
15

Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,
Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery

Material in this action.
2.12

16

Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services

17

(e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and

18

organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and

19

subcontractors.
2.13

20
21

Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.14

22

Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a

23

Producing Party.

24

3.

25

SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected

26

Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected

27

Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any

28

testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-3-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page4 of 14

1

Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not

2

cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of

3

disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a

4

Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including

5

becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to

6

the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the

7

disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of

8

confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed

9

by a separate agreement or order.

10

4.

DURATION

11

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by

12

this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court

13

order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all

14

claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after

15

the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this

16

action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time

17

pursuant to applicable law.

18

5.

19

DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1

Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party

20

or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care

21

to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards.

22

The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents,

23

items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material,

24

documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept

25

unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

26
27

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are
shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to

28
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-4-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page5 of 14

1

unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary

2

expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

3

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated

4

for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all

5

other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

6

5.2

Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order

7

(see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered,

8

Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly

9

so designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

10

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

11

(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but

12

excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing

13

Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains protected material. If only

14

a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also

15

must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the

16

margins).

17

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for

18

inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated

19

which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the

20

designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed

21

“CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied

22

and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,

23

qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the

24

Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” legend to each page that contains Protected

25

Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the

26

Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

27

markings in the margins).

28
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-5-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page6 of 14

1

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the

2

Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other

3

proceeding, all protected testimony.
(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other

4
5

tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the

6

container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend

7

“CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection,

8

the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).
5.3

9

Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

10

designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

11

right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a

12

designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is

13

treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

14

6.

15

CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1

Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

16

confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

17

designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic

18

burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to

19

challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the

20

original designation is disclosed.

21

6.2

Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution

22

process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the

23

basis for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the

24

written notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with

25

this specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each

26

challenge in good faith and must begin the process by meeting and conferring within 14 days of

27

the date of service of notice, and such meet and confer must comply with the process set forth in

28

the Standing Order for Magistrate Hon. Donna M. Ryu addressing discovery disputes. In
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-6-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page7 of 14

1

conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality

2

designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the

3

designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered,

4

to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next

5

stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process, as set forth

6

in the Standing Order for Magistrate Hon. Donna M. Ryu addressing discovery disputes, or if

7

the Challenging Party establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the

8

meet and confer process in a timely manner.
6.3

9

Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

10

intervention, the Parties shall file a joint letter brief under the Standing Order for Magistrate

11

Hon. Donna M. Ryu addressing discovery disputes (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule

12

79-5, if applicable). Lead trial counsel for both parties must sign the letter and the joint letter

13

must comply with the Standing Order for Magistrate Hon. Donna M. Ryu addressing discovery

14

disputes. In the rare instance that a joint letter is not possible, each side may submit a letter not

15

to exceed four pages, which shall include an explanation of why a joint letter was not possible. .

16

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

17

Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose

18

unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to

19

sanctions. All parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to

20

which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the court rules on the

21

challenge.

22

7.

23

ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1

Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed

24

or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for

25

prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be

26

disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order.

27

When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of

28

section 13 below (FINAL DISPOSITION).
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-7-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page8 of 14

1

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and

2

in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

3

7.2

Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise

4

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may

5

disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

6

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as

7

employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the

8

information for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

9

Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A;

10

(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving

11

Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the

12

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

13

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is

14

reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and

15

Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

16

(d) the court and its personnel;(e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or

17

trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably

18

necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be

19

Bound” (Exhibit A);

20

(f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably

21

necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit

22

A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of

23

transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must

24

be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as

25

permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order.

26
27

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or
other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

28
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-8-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page9 of 14

1

7.3

Documents designated “CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or

2

“CONFIDENTIAL AEO” shall not be disclosed to Plaintiff. In the event Mr. Candappa

3

withdraws or is terminated as counsel for Plaintiff, documents designated “CONFIDENTIAL

4

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “CONFIDENTIAL AEO” shall not be disclosed to Plaintiff

5

or Plaintiff’s new attorney of record without such new attorney of record or Plaintiff first

6

obtaining leave to do so from this Court.

7

8.

PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER

8

LITIGATION

9

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that

10

compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as

11

“CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must:
(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a

12
13

copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the

14
15

other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to

16

this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order;

17

and
(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the

18
19

Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the

20
21

subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as

22

“CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order

23

issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party

24

shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material

25

- and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving

26

Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

27

///

28
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-9-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page10 of 14

1

9.

A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN

2

THIS LITIGATION

3

(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in

4

this action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties

5

in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order.

6

Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking

7

additional protections.

8

(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-

9

Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with

10

the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party shall:
(1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some

11
12

or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;
(2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective

13
14

Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description

15

of the information requested; and

16

(3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.

17

(c) If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court within 14

18

days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce

19

the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party

20

timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its

21

possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a

22

determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the

23

burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

24

10.

25

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

26

Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective

27

Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the

28

unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-10-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page11 of 14

1

Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were

2

made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the

3

“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

4

11.

INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED

5

MATERIAL

6

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently

7

produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the

8

Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This

9

provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery

10

order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of

11

Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of

12

a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product

13

protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order

14

submitted to the court.

15

12.

16
17
18

MISCELLANEOUS
12.1

Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

seek its modification by the court in the future.
12.2

Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective

19

Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing

20

any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order.

21

Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the

22

material covered by this Protective Order.

23

12.3

Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating

24

Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not

25

file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under

26

seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may

27

only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific

28

Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-11-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page12 of 14

1

upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a

2

trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to

3

file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the court,

4

then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record pursuant to Civil Local

5

Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by the court.

6

13.

FINAL DISPOSITION
Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each

7
8

Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such

9

material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,

10

compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

11

Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must

12

submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the

13

Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all

14

the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party

15

has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing

16

or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled

17

to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing

18

transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports,

19

attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain

20

Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material

21

remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).

22

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

23
24

DATED: April 21, 2014

25
26

///

27

///

28

LAW OFFICE OF JIVAKA CANDAPPA
/s/ Jivaka Candappa
By: _________________________________________
Jivaka Candappa, Attorney for Plaintiff

///
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-12-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page13 of 14

HOWARD ROME MARTIN & RIDLEY, LLP

6

10

S

. Ryu

onna M
Judge D

HON. DONNA M. RYU
E
C
UNITED R N
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
F

H

9

Dated: April 22, 2014

IT

RT

8

RED

RD
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. E
IS SO O
NO

7

UNIT
ED

5

RT
U
O

4

R NIA

3

By: /s/ Melissa M. Holmes
Joseph C. Howard,STR
I Jr. IC
ES D
Todd H. Master
TC
AT
Melissa M. Holmes
T
Attorneys for Defendants

FO

DATED: April 21, 2014

A

2

LI

1

D IS T IC T O
R

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-13-

Case4:13-cv-03237-DMR Document53 Filed04/21/14 Page14 of 14

1

EXHIBIT A

2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

I, ______________________________________________ [print or type full name], of
______________________________________________________ [print or type full address],
declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated
Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California on ________________ in the case of Cory Narog v. City of Redwood City et al.,
Case No. C13-3237 DMR. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this
Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could
expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I
will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated
Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this
Order.
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective
Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.
I hereby appoint ________________________________________ [print or type full
name] of _____________________________________________________________________
[print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in
connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective
Order.
Date: ______________________________________
City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________
Printed name: _______________________________
Signature: __________________________________

28
Amended [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order: Production of Confidential Records:
Narog v. Redwood City C13-3237 DMR
-14-