Narog v. City of Redwood City et al

Filing 97

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Re 96 Letter filed by Cory Narog. Settlement Conference reset to 2/6/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/22/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2015)

Download PDF
J IVAKA C ANDAPPA ATTORNEY AT LAW 739 East Walnut Street, Suite 204 Pasadena, CA 91101 T 626 345 5334 jcandappa@candappalaw.com January 21, 2015 Hon. Laurel Beeler, U.S. Magistrate United States District Court Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Courtroom C - 15th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 Re. Coy Narog v. City of Redwood City et al. Case No: C13-3237 DMR (LB) Request to Continue Settlement Conference Your Honor: Plaintiff Cory Narog and his counsel respectfully request the Court to continue the settlement conference currently scheduled for January 23, 2015, to February 6, 2015. Mr. Narog woke up this morning suffering from flu-like symptoms and it is unlikely that he will recover by the 23rd. Additionally, given the likelihood that Mr. Narog is suffering from a viral infection, Plaintiff’s counsel would prefer that the settlement conference be continued for a couple of weeks. Counsel for the parties have met and conferred on this matter and are available on February 6, 2015, if the Court’s schedule so permits. Defendants do not object to continuing the settlement conference on the basis of Plaintiff’s request. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jivaka Candappa Jivaka Candappa Attorney for Plaintiff Cory Narog Respectfully submitted, /s/ Melissa M. Holmes Melissa M. Holmes Attorney for City of Redwood City Defendants The Settlement Conference is reset to February 6, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. ISTRIC ES D TC AT T FO RT A H ER R NIA eeler aurel B Judge L LI UNIT ED VED APPRO NO RT U O S Dated: January 22, 2015 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?