Lithium Technologies, Inc. v. Thompson

Filing 39

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER VENUE AND/OR COMPEL CONTRACTUAL ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION; Set/Reset Deadlines as to 20 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer Venue, and/or Compel C ontractual Alternative Dispute Resolution, 23 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order Pending Binding Arbitration; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. Motion Hearing set for 1/28/2014 is CONTINUED to Tuesday, 2/11/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/23/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2014)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6
7

LITHIUM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
DALLAS THOMPSON, AN INDIVIDUAL AND
DOES 1-50,

Case No.: 13-CV-3244 YGR
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTION
TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER VENUE AND/OR
COMPEL CONTRACTUAL ALTERNATIVE
DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Defendant(s).

12

Pending before this Court are two motions: Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
13

(Dkt. No. 23) and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Venue and/or Compel Contractual
14

Alternative Dispute Resolution (Dkt. No. 20).
15

These motions were originally set for hearing on January 7, 2014. On December 23, 2013,
16

the parties filed a Joint Notice Regarding Mediation (Dkt. No. 33) and a Stipulation to Request
17

Court to Continue Hearing on Motions (Dkt. No. 34). The parties stated that “[d]ue to ongoing
18

settlement discussions, [they] believe[d] that a continuance of the hearings on the two matters
19

would aid the parties in achieving a potential resolution.” (Dkt. No. 34.) In light of this
20

representation, the Court continued the Motions hearing to January 28, 2014. On January 21, 2014
21

the parties filed separate statements concerning the status of settlement discussions. (Dkt. Nos. 37,
22

38.) In their statements, the parties indicated that settlement discussions remain ongoing.
23

Accordingly, the Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing on the parties’ pending motions to
24

February, 11, 2014.
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28

Date: January 23, 2014

_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE