Garcia v. City and County of San Francisco

Filing 36

ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue CMC or Telephonic Appearance filed by Jose A. Hernandez Garcia. Updated Joint Case Management Statement due by 5/21/2014. Further Case Management Conference continued to 5/28/2014 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 4/21/14. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

H. Nelson Meeks CBN #175800
LAW OFFICES OF H. NELSON MEEKS
870 Market Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94102
[phone]
[phone] (FAX)
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOSE ALIS HERNANDEZ GARCIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JOSE ALIS HERNANDEZ GARCIA
PLAINTIFF

9
10

V.

11
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO AND DOES 1 TO 50,
INCLUSIVE
DEFENDANTS

13
870 Market Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94102

Law Offices of H. Nelson Meeks

12

CASE NO: C 13-03295 DMR
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CMC AND
IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO ALLOW FOR
PLAINTIFF TO TELEPHONICALLY
APPEAR
DATE:
TIME:
DEPT:

APRIL 23, 2014
1:30 PM
COURTROOM 4

14
15
16
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF
17
TO TELEPHONICALLY APPEAR
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiff, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants, by and through their
attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, that the CMC be
continued to any of the following dates: May 14, May 21 or May 28, 2014. In the alternative,
the parties stipulate that Plaintiff’s counsel may appear by telephone. In support thereof,
Plaintiff states as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s counsel, H. Nelson Meeks, will be out of town on April 23, 2014.

2.

Co-counsel, Ms. J.D. Trow and Mr. William W. Haskell, both of whom are familiar with
this case, and whom Mr. Meeks planned on having available if necessary, are not
available. Ms. J.D. Trow is not available because she is recovering from a recent cancer

27
28
PI -- Hernandez Garcia
v. SFPD
C 13-03295 DMR

-1STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OR ALLOW
TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE

1

surgery necessitating her absence through April 30th. Mr. Haskell became unavailable

2

because a trial for which he is serving as a judge, now appears that it will not conclude

3
4
5

until sometime after Wednesday.
3.

Neither party will be prejudiced by a continuance.

4.

In the alternative, Plaintiff’s counsel requests permission to appear by telephone.

6
7
8

Dated: April 21, 2014

9
10
11

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS
Chief Trial Deputy
WARREN METLITZKY
Deputy City Attorney
By: /s/ Warren Metlitzky
WARREN METLITZKY

13
870 Market Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94102

Law Offices of H. Nelson Meeks

12

14

Attorneys for Defendant
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO

15
16
17

Dated: April 21, 2014

LAW OFFICES OF H. NELSON MEEKS

18
By: /s/ H. Nelson Meeks
H. NELSON MEEKS

19
20

Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSE A. HERNANDEZ GARCIA
Plaintiff

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PI -- Hernandez Garcia
v. SFPD
C 13-03295 DMR

-2STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OR ALLOW
TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER (AS MODIFIED)
Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5

___ The CMC is continued until _________. at 1:30 p.m. The updated Joint Case Management
X
May 28, 2014
Conference Statement is due no later than May 21, 2014.
___ Plaintiff’s counsel may appear by telephone.

6
7

DATE: April 21, 2014

8

__________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
Magistrate Judge

9
10
11

13
870 Market Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94102

Law Offices of H. Nelson Meeks

12

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PI -- Hernandez Garcia
v. SFPD
C 13-03295 DMR

-3STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OR ALLOW
TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE