Garcia v. City and County of San Francisco
Filing
50
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, see Dkt 46 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party he reto shall certify to this court, within 60 days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. All further dates are vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 09/02/14. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
JOSE A. HERNANDEZ GARCIA,
9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff(s),
No. C-13-03295 DMR
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
12
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
13
14
The court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice;
16
provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within 60 days, with proof of
17
service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has
18
not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be
19
restored to the calendar to be set for trial. All further dates are vacated.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: September 2, 2014
23
24
25
26
27
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?