Giscome et al v. Housing Development and Neighborhood Preservation et al
Filing
29
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. The Court VACATES the Case Management Conference currently set for January 27, 2014. A Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 1/31/2014 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/16/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2014)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
5
GIOVANA GISCOME AND CIARA
LOVELANCE,
Plaintiffs,
6
7
8
9
Case No.: 13-cv-03308-YGR
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND SETTING COMPLIANCE
HEARING
vs.
GRANDEHO’S INCORPORATED
and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
The Court hereby VACATES the case management conference currently set for January 27,
2014. A compliance hearing regarding counsels’ familiarity and compliance with General Order 56
shall be held on Friday, January 31, 2014 on the Court's 9:01 a.m. calendar, in the Federal
Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in courtroom 5.
Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file either
17
(a) verification that they have read and are complying with General Order 56 or (b) a one-page JOINT
18
STATEMENT setting forth an explanation for their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the
19
parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar.
20
Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a
21
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
Dated: January 16, 2014
26
27
28
___________________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?