JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Lopez et al

Filing 5

ORDER. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on September 10, 2013. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 9 Plaintiff, Case No.: 4:13-cv-3490 KAW ORDER OF REMAND 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 v. TERESA LOPEZ, et al., Defendants. 14 15 Defendants Theresa Lopez and David Garcia removed this unlawful detainer action from 16 Stanislaus County Superior Court on July 29, 2013. They are proceeding pro se. 17 The notice of removal states that this court has diversity jurisdiction over this case. District 18 courts have jurisdiction in civil actions where there is complete diversity of citizenship among the 19 parties and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 28 U.S.C. ยง 20 1332(a). Here, the complaint alleges that the amount in controversy does not exceed $10,000. 21 On August 6, 2013, this court ordered Defendants to show cause why the case should not be 22 remanded to Stanislaus County Superior Court for lack of federal jurisdiction. Defendants were given 23 14 days to respond to the court's order. Defendants have not done so. 24 In the order to show cause, the court also granted Defendant Garcia's application to proceed in 25 forma pauperis. The court also ordered that Defendant Lopez, who had not filed an application to 26 proceed in forma pauperis, pay the filling fee or file such an application within 14 days of the order. 27 Defendant Lopez has not done so. 28 1 2 3 Good cause appearing, the court hereby orders that this case be remanded to Stanislaus County Superior Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATE: September 10, 2013 ___________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?