Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Yelp, Inc.

Filing 106

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 95 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2013)

Case4:13-cv-03587-DMR Document95-2 Filed12/02/13 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

ANNE M. ROGASKI (State Bar No. 184754)
[e-mail]
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-326-2422
ROBERT D. TADLOCK (State Bar No. 238479)
[e-mail]
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-576-0300

12

JEFFREY M. CONNOR (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 303-571-4321

13

Attorneys for Defendant YELP INC.

9
10
11

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
YELP INC.,
Defendant.

Civil Action No. C 13-3587 DMR
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
PORTIONS OF DEFENDANT’S REPLY
IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR
STAY PENDING INTER PARTES
REVIEW

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. C 13-3587 DMR

-1-

Case4:13-cv-03587-DMR Document95-2 Filed12/02/13 Page2 of 2
1

Now before the Court is Defendant’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of

2

Defendant’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (“Defendant’s

3

Administrative Motion”). Upon consideration of Defendant’s Administrative Motion and the

4

supporting declaration of Jeffrey M. Connor filed therewith, the Court finds there to be good cause

5

for granting Defendant’s request to file the below-referenced document under seal.

6

GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the Court finds that:

7

1.

8

Plaintiff possesses an overriding confidentiality interest that overcomes the right of

public access to the record in the following document or portions thereof:

9
10

Document

Portion to be Sealed

11

Defendant’s Reply in Support of its Motion for

Redacted Portions Thereof

12

Stay Pending Inter Partes Review

13
14

2.

Plaintiff’s confidentiality interests support sealing the record;

15

3.

A substantial probability exists that Plaintiff’s overriding confidentiality interests

16

will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed;

17

4.

The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and

18

5.

No less restrictive means exists to achieve this overriding interest.

19

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Administrative Motion to File Under

20

Seal Portions of Defendant’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Stay Pending Inter Partes Review

21

is GRANTED.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26

DATED: December 17, 2013__

Honorable Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. C 13-3587 DMR

-1-