G.F. et al v. Contra Costa County et al

Filing 60

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 59 Stipulation to Permit Withdrawal and refiling of Motion to Dismiss (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

70 Washington Street, Suite 205
Oakland, California 94607
Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: [phone]

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP

10
11 G.F., by and through her guardian ad litem,
Gail F.; W.B., by and through his guardian ad
12 litem, CiCi C.; Q.G., by and through his
guardian ad litem, Barbara C.; and on behalf of
13 themselves and a class of those similarly
situated,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
vs.
16
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY; CONTRA
17 COSTA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
PROBATION; PHILIP KADER, in his official
18 capacity, Chief County Probation Officer;
BRUCE PELLE, in his official capacity,
19 Superintendent of Juvenile Hall; CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY OFFICE OF
20 EDUCATION; JOSEPH A. OVICK, in his
official capacity as Superintendent, Contra
21 Costa County Office of Education; LYNN
MACKEY, in her official capacity, Director of
22 Contra Costa County Court Schools.,
23

CASE NO. C-13-03667 SBA
ORDER TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL
AND RE-FILING OF MOTION TO
DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY OFFICE OF
EDUCATION, JOSEPH OVICK AND
LYNN MACKEY; ORDER

Trial Date:

None Set

Defendants.

24
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28

C-13-03667 SBA
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL AND RE-FILING OF MOTION TO
DISMISS THE COMPLAINT

1

Pursuant to the parties’ s stipulation to permit withdrawal and re-filing of the motion to

2 dismiss by defendants Contra Costa County Office of Education, Joseph Ovick and Lynn Mackey
3 (collectively “Office of Education”), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
4

1.

The Clerk of the Court shall withdraw the Motion to Dismiss on file at Docket No.

5 47 in this matter;
6

2.

The County Office of Education shall file a revised motion to dismiss on or before

7 October 18, 2013;
8

3.

The County Office of Education shall link its revised motion to dismiss in the ECF

9 system to the supporting documents on file at Docket Nos. 48 through 52;
4.

The briefing and hearing dates on the motion to dismiss shall remain unchanged.

11
70 Washington Street, Suite 205
Oakland, California 94607
Main: 510-550-8200 • Fax: [phone]

Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP

10

12 IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
10/11/2013
14 Dated: ____________________

___________________________________
The Honorable Sandra B. Armstrong
Judge of the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California

15
16
17
18

00290-00103/506119.1

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

C-13-03667 SBA
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO PERMIT WITHDRAWAL AND RE-FILING OF MOTION TO
DISMISS THE COMPLAINT