G.F. et al v. Contra Costa County et al

Filing 76

ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong Granting 75 STIPULATION RE: ASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES. (Terminating 72 Motion). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 G.F., by and through her guardian ad litem, Gail F.; W.B., by and through his guardian ad litem, CiCi C.; Q.G., by and through his guardian ad litem, Barbara C.; and on behalf of themselves and a class of those similarly situated, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION; PHILIP KADER, in his official capacity, Chief County Probation Officer; BRUCE PELLE, in his official capacity, Superintendent of Juvenile Hall; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION; JOSEPH A. OVICK, in his official capacity as Superintendent, Contra Costa County Office of Education; LYNN MACKEY, in her official capacity, Director of Contra Costa County Court Schools. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. Case No. C 13-3667-SBA ORDER RE: ASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES 1 2 Pursuant to the Stipulation re: Assignment to Magistrate Judge Spero for Settlement Purposes, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The parties are assigned to Magistrate Judge Spero for settlement purposes; and 4 2. Defendants’ Motion for Request for Settlement Conference before Judge Spero 5 (Dkt. No. 72) is taken off calendar. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 10 12/13/2013 Dated: ____________________ ___________________________________ The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G.F., et al. v. Contra Costa County, et al., Case No. C 13-3667-SBA [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ASSIGNMENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?