STX Pan Ocean Co. Ltd. v. Dynamic Influence Shipping S.A. et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO U.S. MARSHAL REGARDING PROCESS OF MARITIME ATTACHMENT. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/9/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JOHN D. GIFFIN, CASB No. 89608
[e-mail]
JENNIFER M. PORTER, CASB No. 261508
[e-mail]
JESSICA LUHRS, CASB No. 284846
[e-mail]
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
A Professional Corporation
450 Pacific Ave
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff
STX PAN OCEAN CO. LTD

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

STX PAN OCEAN CO. LTD. ,

13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.

17

DYNAMIC INFLUENCE SHIPPING S.A.;
CIDO HOLDING COMPANY; CIDO
SHIPPING (HK) CO. LTD.; CIDO TANKER
HOLDING CO. ,

18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CaseNumber
IN ADMIRALTY
ORDER TO U.S. MARSHAL REGARDING
PROCESS OF MARITIME ATTACHMENT
AND GARNISHMENT

Defendants.

16

19
20

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

21
22
23

TO THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA – Greetings:

24
25
26
27
28

WHEREAS, a Verified Complaint has been filed in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California on the 8th of August 2013 by:
STX PAN OCEAN CO. LTD., Plaintiff, vs. DYNAMIC INFLUENCE SHIPPING
S.A.; CIDO HOLDING COMPANY; CIDO SHIPPING (HK) CO. LTD.; and CIDO HOLDING CO.,
-1KYL_SF608312
ORDER TO U.S. MARSHAL REGARDING PROCESS OF MARITIME ATTACHMENT
AND GARNISHMENT - Case No. CaseNumber

1

Defendants in certain action for breach of a maritime contract and failure to pay or otherwise secure

2

claims and damages due and owing to the said Plaintiff in the amount of US $28,957,456.67 and

3

praying for Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment against the said Defendants, and

4

WHEREAS, this process is issued pursuant to such prayer and requires that each

5

garnishee shall serve its answer within twenty (20) days after service of process upon them and

6

requires that Defendants shall serve their answer within thirty (30) days after process has been

7

executed whether by attachment of property or service on the garnishee.

8
9

NOW, THEREFORE, we do hereby command you to attach goods and chattels to the
amount sued for; and if such property cannot be found that you attach credits and effects to the amount

10

sued for; in the hands of the garnishees in this District including, but not limited to: the MV BUM

11

EUN and/or any other property in whatever form belonging to the Defendants in this District and to

12

hold such property in your custody or substitute custodian’s custody as the Court may further order.

13
Oakland
9th
SIGNED at _____________________________, California this _________ day of

14
August, 2013.

16

hyllis J.

A

H

ER

Hamilton

LI

Judge P

R NIA

S

RT

20

O OR

IT IS S

NO

19

UNIT
ED

18

RT
U
O

17

S DISTRI

CT
TE
C
___________________________________
TA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DERED

FO

15

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2KYL_SF608312
ORDER TO U.S. MARSHAL REGARDING PROCESS OF MARITIME ATTACHMENT AND
GARNISHMENT - Case No. CaseNumber