STX Pan Ocean Co. Ltd. v. Dynamic Influence Shipping S.A. et al
Filing
33
ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice and for Full Release of Security. Motions terminated: 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE AND FULL RELEASE OF SECURITY filed by Cido Holding Co, Dynamic Influence Shipping S.A., Cido Tanker Holding Company, Cido Shipping (H.K.) Co., Ltd.., ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/30/2014. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2014)
Case4:13-cv-03691-PJH Document32 Filed09/29/14 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
JOHN D. GIFFIN, CASB No. 89608
john.giffin@kyl.com
JENNIFER M. PORTER, CASB No. 261508
jennifer.porter@kyl.com
JESSICA LUHRS, CASB No. 284846
Jessica.luhrs@kyl.com
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
A Professional Corporation
450 Pacific Ave.
San Francisco, California 94133
Telephone: (415) 398-6000
Facsimile: (415) 981-0136
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff STX PAN OCEAN CO. LTD
8
9
10
Holland & Knight LLP
50 California Street, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 743-6900
Fax: (415) 743-6910
11
12
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
Matthew P. Vafidis (California Bar # 103578)
Adanna M. Love (California Bar # 280538)
50 California Street, Suite 2800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: 415.743.6900
Facsimile: 415.743.6910
matthew.vafidis@hklaw.com
adanna.love@hklaw.com
13
14
Attorneys for Defendants DYNAMIC INFLUENCE SHIPPING S.A.;
CIDO TANKER HOLDING COMPANY; CIDO SHIPPING (HK)
CO. LTD.; and CIDO HOLDING CO.
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
OAKLAND DIVISION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STX PAN OCEAN CO. LTD.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DYNAMIC INFLUENCE SHIPPING S.A.;
)
CIDO SHIPPING (HK) CO. LTD.; CIDO
)
TANKER HOLDING COMPANY; and CIDO )
HOLDING CO.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.: CV-13-3691-PJH
ORDER ON
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE,
BY PLAINTIFF; AND STIPULATION
FOR AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR
FULL RELEASE OF SECURITY
Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Fed. R.Civ.P.
27
28
STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL AND RELEASE OF SECURITY
Case No.: CV-13-3691-PJH
Case4:13-cv-03691-PJH Document32 Filed09/29/14 Page2 of 4
1
2
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff STX PAN OCEAN CO. LTD.
("Plaintiff") and Defendants DYNAMIC INFLUENCE SHIPPING S.A., CIDO SHIPPING (HK)
3
CO. LTD., CIDO TANKER HOLDING COMPANY, and CIDO HOLDING CO. (collectively
4
“Defendants”), and each of them, by and through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
5
WHEREAS,
6
1.
This action was filed on August 8, 2013.
7
2.
In its Verified Complaint herein, (Doc.#1), Plaintiff applied for a writ of maritime
Asset Forfeiture Actions ("the Supplemental Rules") to attach the M.V. BUM EUN, then within this
10
district. On August 9, 2013, this Court issued an Order Authorizing Process of Maritime
11
Holland & Knight LLP
attachment, pursuant to Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and
9
50 California Street, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 743-6900
Fax: (415) 743-6910
8
Attachment and Garnishment, Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment and an Order to
12
13
the U.S. Marshal Regarding Process of Maritime Attachment and, thereafter, the M.V. BUM EUN
was seized or attached within this district, pursuant to Rule B and the said Orders.
3.
14
15
On August 16, 2013, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective
counsel of record herein, filed a stipulation in this action agreeing, upon certain terms and
conditions set forth therein, that, pursuant to Rule E(5)(a) of the Supplemental Rules, a deposit of
16
security may be made on behalf of Defendants in the amount of Thirty Million Dollars Only
17
18
19
($30,000,000) to the Clerk of Court for deposit into the Court's registry, and that upon the giving of
the said security, Plaintiff would immediately obtain the release of the M.V. BUM EUN from
seizure without the necessity of any further order from this Court (Doc.#18.)
20
4.
On August 16, 2013, in accordance with the Court's Order approving the said
21
stipulation, Defendants' counsel paid Thirty Million Dollars Only ($30,000,000), in the form of a
22
check drawn on its Client Trust Account, to the Clerk of Court for deposit into the Court's registry.
23
Thereafter, Plaintiff's counsel obtained the release of the M.V. BUM EUN from attachment.
24
5.
In October 2013, Plaintiff commenced arbitration in London of the claims against
25
Defendants that are the subject of this action. On October 23, 2013, Plaintiff and Defendants
26
submitted a stipulation to this Court requesting an Order staying this action for a year (Doc. #26),
27
which order was granted by this Court on October 24, 2013 (Doc. #27.)
28
//
-2STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL AND RELEASE OF SECURITY
Case No.: CV-13-3691-PJH
Case4:13-cv-03691-PJH Document32 Filed09/29/14 Page3 of 4
1
2
6.
On September 17, 2014, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective
counsel of record, filed a stipulation, under the terms and conditions set forth therein, requesting an
3
Order for the partial release of the security, specifically that the Clerk of Court release from its
4
registry the amount of Five Million Dollars Only ($5,000,000), which Order was granted by this
5
Court on September 17, 2014 (Doc. #31.)
6
7.
On September 24, 2014, Defendants' counsel received the funds released from the
7
Court's registry in the form of a check in the amount of Five Million Dollars Only ($5,000,000), and
8
submitted to the Court an acknowledgement of the receipt of the said payment.
8.
9
As of September 24, 2014, the amount of security deposited in the Court's registry in
Holland & Knight LLP
connection with this action was and is Twenty Five Million Dollars Only ($25,000,000), plus any
11
50 California Street, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 743-6900
Fax: (415) 743-6910
10
accrued interest.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that:
12
1.
13
14
15
Plaintiff and Defendants have concluded a full and final settlement of the disputes
that are and were the subject of the arbitration in London and the subject of the Verified Complaint
in this action.
2.
Pursuant to the said settlement agreement, Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss this action
16
with prejudice and without award of costs or fees to any party.
17
18
19
3.
without costs or fees to any party; Defendants, and each of them, hereby agree to the said dismissal
of this action.
20
21
Accordingly, Plaintiff hereby voluntarily dismisses this action with prejudice, and
4.
Said dismissal is made pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
22
5.
Plaintiff and Defendants hereby jointly request an Order be issued by the Court that,
23
the Clerk of the Court be ordered to, and shall immediately, release the full amount of the security
24
held in the Court's registry, in the amount of Twenty Five Million Dollars Only ($25,000,000), plus
25
accrued interest, and that this sum be released to the law firm of Holland &Knight LLLP, in Trust,
26
on behalf of the Defendants and each of them.
27
//
28
//
-3STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL AND RELEASE OF SECURITY
Case No.: CV-13-3691-PJH
Case4:13-cv-03691-PJH Document32 Filed09/29/14 Page4 of 4
1
2
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: September 29, 2014
KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN
3
/s/ Jessica Luhrs
John Giffin
Jessica Luhrs
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STX PAN OCEAN CO. LTD.
4
5
6
7
Dated: September 29, 2014
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
8
/s/ Matthew P. Vafidis
Matthew P. Vafidis
Adanna M. Love
Attorneys for Defendants
DYNAMIC INFLUENCE SHIPPING S.A.,
CIDO SHIPPING (HK) CO. LTD., CIDO TANKER
HOLDING COMPANY, and CIDO HOLDING CO.
9
10
13
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
19
ERED
United IT IS SO ORD Judge
States District
NO
18
Dated: September 30 , 2014
hyllis
Judge P
ER
A
H
20
ton
J. Hamil
R NIA
17
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
FO
16
S
15
LI
14
UNIT
ED
Holland & Knight LLP
12
RT
U
O
50 California Street, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 743-6900
Fax: (415) 743-6910
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION RE: DISMISSAL AND RELEASE OF SECURITY
Case No.: CV-13-3691-PJH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?