APL CO. Pte., LTD., et al v. IMPX Traders Inc. et al
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 27 Ex Parte Request for Extension of Time to Obtain Counsel. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on December 19, 2013. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
APL CO PTE LTD., et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE REQUEST
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OBTAIN
COUNSEL
vs.
11
12
Case No.: C 13-3706 KAW
IMPX TRADERS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
15
On December 16, 2013, pro se defendant Mallesh Hiriyuri filed a letter. (Ltr., Dkt. No. 27.)
16
In the letter, he requests that he be able to respond on behalf of defendant IMPX Traders, Inc. (Id.)
17
In the alternative, he requests an additional 30 days to find and retain counsel to represent the
18
company. (Id.)
The court denies Mr. Hiriyuri's request for permission to respond on behalf of defendant
19
20
IMPX Traders, Inc. for the reasons set forth in the original order requiring the company to retain
21
counsel. (See Order Requiring Defendant IMPX Traders, Inc. to Retain Counsel, Dkt. No. 26.) The
22
court, however, grants Mr. Hiriyuri's request for an additional 30 days to find and retain counsel to
23
represent IMPX Traders, Inc.
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
In addition, the court refers Mr. Hiriyuri to the Pennsylvania Bar Association's website,
2
http://www.pabar.org/public/Membership/lrsblurb.asp, and the California State Bar website,
3
http://www.calbar.ca.gov/Public/LawyerReferralServicesLRS.aspx, which contain information that
4
may be useful to him, including a list of local lawyer referral services.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: December 19, 2013
___________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?