APL CO. Pte., LTD., et al v. IMPX Traders Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER Granting 27 Ex Parte Request for Extension of Time to Obtain Counsel. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on December 19, 2013. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 APL CO PTE LTD., et al., 9 Plaintiffs, 10 Northern District of California United States District Court ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OBTAIN COUNSEL vs. 11 12 Case No.: C 13-3706 KAW IMPX TRADERS, INC., et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 On December 16, 2013, pro se defendant Mallesh Hiriyuri filed a letter. (Ltr., Dkt. No. 27.) 16 In the letter, he requests that he be able to respond on behalf of defendant IMPX Traders, Inc. (Id.) 17 In the alternative, he requests an additional 30 days to find and retain counsel to represent the 18 company. (Id.) The court denies Mr. Hiriyuri's request for permission to respond on behalf of defendant 19 20 IMPX Traders, Inc. for the reasons set forth in the original order requiring the company to retain 21 counsel. (See Order Requiring Defendant IMPX Traders, Inc. to Retain Counsel, Dkt. No. 26.) The 22 court, however, grants Mr. Hiriyuri's request for an additional 30 days to find and retain counsel to 23 represent IMPX Traders, Inc. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 In addition, the court refers Mr. Hiriyuri to the Pennsylvania Bar Association's website, 2 http://www.pabar.org/public/Membership/lrsblurb.asp, and the California State Bar website, 3 http://www.calbar.ca.gov/Public/LawyerReferralServicesLRS.aspx, which contain information that 4 may be useful to him, including a list of local lawyer referral services. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: December 19, 2013 ___________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?