O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
19
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 15 MOTION Plaintiffs' Renewed Emergency Motion for Protective Order to Strike Arbitration Clauses filed by Douglas O'Connor Replies due by 9/23/2013. Responses due by 9/16/2013. Motion Hearing set for 10/3/2013 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore.. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on August 27, 2013. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)
1
2
United States District Court
Northern District of California
3
4
5
6
DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
7
8
9
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Case No.: 13-03826-KAW
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
ON PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER TO STRIKE
ARBITRATION CLAUSES
Defendants.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On August 26, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a "Renewed Emergency Motion for Protective Order
13
to Strike Arbitration Clauses." (Mot.; Dkt. No. 15). The court finds that the issues Plaintiffs
14
raised in the motion are not an emergency, nor is there reason to hear the motion on an expedited
15
schedule. As Plaintiffs note in the moving papers, the arbitration clauses can be stricken at a later
16
date, if warranted.
17
Accordingly, the court will hold a hearing on the motion on October 3, 2013 at 11:00 a.m.
18
Defendants shall file an opposition to the motion on or before September 16, 2013. Plaintiffs
19
shall file a reply on or before September 23, 2013. The court hereby vacates any previously set
20
deadlines regarding any opposition or reply to Plaintiffs' motion.
21
Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this order on Defendants no later than Friday, August 30,
22
2013. Plaintiffs shall also file proof of service evidencing proper service of this order on
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: August 27, 2013
___________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?