O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 899

Order by Judge Edward M. Chen in case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC; granting (307) Modified Stipulation in case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC. Case Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration and/or Dismiss reset from 11/8 to 11/20/2018 at 1:30 p.m.Associated Cases: 3:15-cv-00262-EMC, 3:13-cv-03826-EMC(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, SBN 310719 (sliss@llrlaw.com) ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice (apagano@llrlaw.com) LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. 726 Boylston Street, Suite 2000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 994-5800 Facsimile: (617) 994-5801 7 8 Attorneys for O’Connor and Yucesoy Plaintiffs GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099 tboutrous@gibsondunn.com THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570 tevangelis@gibsondunn.com DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA, SBN 254433 dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557 jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC 20 v. 21 22 23 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED 24 Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 25 26 HAKAN YUCESOY, et al., Plaintiffs, 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC 1 v. 2 3 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. Defendants. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 STIPULATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the O’Connor Plaintiffs and Yucesoy Plaintiffs (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) and Travis 12 Kalanick (as to the Yucesoy action only) (collectively, “Defendants”) (together with the 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the next Case Management Conference for both the O’Connor and Yucesoy actions and the hearing on Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and/or dismiss in the Yucesoy action (Dkt. 296), is currently set for October 25, 2018 (Dkt. 306); 19 WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiffs to oppose Defendants’ motion to compel 20 arbitration and/or dismiss in the Yucesoy action is currently today, September 25, 2018, and the 21 deadline for Defendants to file a Reply is currently October 9, 2018 (Dkt. 306); 22 23 WHEREAS, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today issued its decision in a number of consolidated appeals in the above-captioned cases; 24 WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agree to Plaintiffs’ request for additional time 25 to oppose Defendants’ motion in Yucesoy to account for the effect of this new appellate authority 26 on Plaintiffs’ briefing of the Yucesoy motion; 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC 1 2 3 WHEREAS, the Parties would prefer that to allow this additional time to complete the briefing on the Yucesoy motion, the Yucesoy hearing and the CMCs in O’Connor and Yucesoy be November 20, 2018 continued to November 8, 2018, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their opposition in Yucesoy be 4 extended by approximately two weeks to October 11, 2018, and the deadline for Defendants to 5 6 7 8 9 10 file their reply in Yucesoy be extended to October 25, 2018; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that this additional brief extension will not prejudice the parties or the Court; NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order establishing the following revised schedule: 11 1. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition papers in Yucesoy on or before October 11, 2018. 12 2. Defendants shall file their reply papers in Yucesoy on or before October 25, 2018. 13 3. The hearing in Yucesoy and the case management conference in O’Connor and Yucesoy 14 shall be continued to November 8, 2018. November 20, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. 15 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED 17 Respectfully submitted, 18 19 Dated: September 25, 2018 /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan Shannon Liss-Riordan Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 22 23 24 LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. Dated: September 25, 2018 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP /s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada Dhananjay S. Manthripragada Attorneys for Defendants 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 September 26 _______________, 2018 9 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 ECF ATTESTATION 15 16 17 18 19 I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. Dated: September 25, 2018 LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C. /s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan Shannon Liss-Riordan 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?