O'Connor et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Filing
899
Order by Judge Edward M. Chen in case 3:13-cv-03826-EMC; granting (307) Modified Stipulation in case 3:15-cv-00262-EMC. Case Management Conference and Motion to Compel Arbitration and/or Dismiss reset from 11/8 to 11/20/2018 at 1:30 p.m.Associated Cases: 3:15-cv-00262-EMC, 3:13-cv-03826-EMC(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN, SBN 310719
(sliss@llrlaw.com)
ADELAIDE PAGANO, pro hac vice
(apagano@llrlaw.com)
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
726 Boylston Street, Suite 2000
Boston, MA 02116
Telephone:
(617) 994-5800
Facsimile:
(617) 994-5801
7
8
Attorneys for O’Connor and Yucesoy
Plaintiffs
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
tboutrous@gibsondunn.com
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
tevangelis@gibsondunn.com
DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA,
SBN 254433
dmanthripragada@gibsondunn.com
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
jlipshutz@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
DOUGLAS O’CONNOR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO. 15-cv-00262-EMC
20
v.
21
22
23
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
HEARING AND ADJUST BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED
24
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
25
26
HAKAN YUCESOY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND
ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC
1
v.
2
3
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.
Defendants.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, the O’Connor Plaintiffs and Yucesoy Plaintiffs
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) and Travis
12
Kalanick (as to the Yucesoy action only) (collectively, “Defendants”) (together with the
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as
follows:
WHEREAS, the next Case Management Conference for both the O’Connor and Yucesoy
actions and the hearing on Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and/or dismiss in the
Yucesoy action (Dkt. 296), is currently set for October 25, 2018 (Dkt. 306);
19
WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiffs to oppose Defendants’ motion to compel
20
arbitration and/or dismiss in the Yucesoy action is currently today, September 25, 2018, and the
21
deadline for Defendants to file a Reply is currently October 9, 2018 (Dkt. 306);
22
23
WHEREAS, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today issued its
decision in a number of consolidated appeals in the above-captioned cases;
24
WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agree to Plaintiffs’ request for additional time
25
to oppose Defendants’ motion in Yucesoy to account for the effect of this new appellate authority
26
on Plaintiffs’ briefing of the Yucesoy motion;
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND
ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC
1
2
3
WHEREAS, the Parties would prefer that to allow this additional time to complete the
briefing on the Yucesoy motion, the Yucesoy hearing and the CMCs in O’Connor and Yucesoy be
November 20, 2018
continued to November 8, 2018, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their opposition in Yucesoy be
4
extended by approximately two weeks to October 11, 2018, and the deadline for Defendants to
5
6
7
8
9
10
file their reply in Yucesoy be extended to October 25, 2018;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that this additional brief extension will not prejudice the
parties or the Court;
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, agree, and respectfully request that the
Court enter an Order establishing the following revised schedule:
11
1. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition papers in Yucesoy on or before October 11, 2018.
12
2. Defendants shall file their reply papers in Yucesoy on or before October 25, 2018.
13
3. The hearing in Yucesoy and the case management conference in O’Connor and Yucesoy
14
shall be continued to November 8, 2018. November 20, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED
17
Respectfully submitted,
18
19
Dated: September 25, 2018
/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20
21
22
23
24
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
Dated: September 25, 2018
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
/s/ Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Dhananjay S. Manthripragada
Attorneys for Defendants
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND
ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
September 26
_______________, 2018
9
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
ECF ATTESTATION
15
16
17
18
19
I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any
signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
Dated: September 25, 2018
LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C.
/s/ Shannon Liss-Riordan
Shannon Liss-Riordan
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING AND
ADJUST BRIEFING SCHEDULE – CASE NO. CV 13-03826-EMC; CASE NO. CV 15-00262-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?