Burns et al v. Halopoff & Sons, Inc. et al

Filing 60

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION re 59 Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation filed by Halopoff & Sons, Inc., Richard Piombo, Operating Engineers and Participating Employers Pre-Apprentice, Apprentice and Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund, Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, Heavy and Highway Committee, Russell E. Burns in amount of $366,181.14, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/10/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2015)

1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
Shivani Nanda, Esq. (SBN 253891)
2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]
4 [phone] – Facsimile
[e-mail]
5 [e-mail]
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7 Justin D. Harris, Esq. (SBN 199112)
MOTSCHIEDLER, MICHAELIDES, WISHON,
8 BREWER & RYAN, LLP
1690 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 200
9 Fresno, CA 93711
[phone]
10 [phone] – Facsimile
[e-mail]
11
Attorneys for Defendants
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16 RUSSELL E. BURNS, et al.,

Case No.: C13-3968 YGR

17

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION

Plaintiffs,
v.

18

HALOPOFF & SONS, INC., a California
19 Corporation; JOHN HALOPOFF, an
individual
20
Defendants.
21
22

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned parties hereto, that

23 Judgment may be entered in the within action in favor of the Plaintiffs RUSSELL E. BURNS, et.
24 al. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) and against Defendant HALOPOFF & SONS, INC., a California
25 Corporation (“Defendant”), as follows:
26

1.

Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against Defendant on August 27, 2013 to compel

27 Defendant to comply with the terms of its Collective Bargaining Agreement.
28

-1-

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Case No.: C13-3968 YGR
G:\YGRALL\Civil Case Files\2013\3968 Burns v Halopoff & Sons\13-3968 Burns v. Halopoff -- Revised Proposed Stipulated Judgment.docx

1

2.

Service on Defendant was effectuated on September 4, 2013.

2

3.

Defendant filed an Answer and Demand for Jury Trial on September 17, 2013.

3

4.

The parties desire to resolve this matter by entry of a Judgment by Stipulation

4 against Defendant, without the necessity of further litigation against Defendant.
5

5.

The parties hereby stipulate that Judgment may be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and

6 against Defendant in the total amount of $366,181.14 as follows:
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

DELINQUENT CONTRIBUTIONS
2/13 Contribution Balance ($16,232,28 due)
20% Liquidated Damages on 2/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 2/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

$14,099.23
$3,246.46
$2,711.69

3/13 Contribution Balance ($19,396.62 due)
20% Liquidated Damages on 3/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 3/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

$16,686.37
$3,879.32
$3,067.55

4/13 Contribution Balance ($20,455.82 due)
20% Liquidated Damages on 4/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 4/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

$19,040.60
$4,091.16
$3,343.84

5/13 Contributions
20% Liquidated Damages on 5/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 5/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

$5,838.86
$1,167.77
$975.81

6/13 Contribution Balance ($10,880.55 due)
20% Liquidated Damages on 6/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 6/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

$9,530.97
$2,176.11
$1,514.51

7/13 Contributions
20% Liquidated Damages on 7/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 7/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

$7,866.11
$1,573.22
$1,183.15

8/13 Contributions
20% Liquidated Damages on 8/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 8/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

$4,622.75
$924.55
$656.05

9/13 Contributions
20% Liquidated Damages on 9/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 9/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

$5,132.87
$1,026.57
$686.26

$20,057.38

$23,633.24

$26,475.60

$7,982.44
16
17

$13,221.59
18
19
20
21
22
23

$10,622.48

$6,203.35

$6,845.70

24
25
26
27

Chart continued on the next page…

28

-2-

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Case No.: C13-3968 YGR
G:\YGRALL\Civil Case Files\2013\3968 Burns v Halopoff & Sons\13-3968 Burns v. Halopoff -- Revised Proposed Stipulated Judgment.docx

10/13 Contributions
20% Liquidated Damages on 10/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 10/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

1
2

$13,477.89
11/13 Contributions
20% Liquidated Damages on 11/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 11/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

4

6

$7,981.18
1/14 Contributions
20% Liquidated Damages on 1/14 Contributions
10% Interest on 1/14 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

7
8

10
11

13

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

$179,584.56
$23,059.00
$3,776.07
TOTAL DUE:

14

19

$126,625.91
$25,325.18
$24,558.05
$3,075.42

Attorneys’ Fees (through 2/24/15)
Costs (through 2/24/15)

12

18

$3,961.98
$792.40
$396.20
$5,150.58

AUDIT (8/1/12 – 11/30/13):
Contribution Underpayments
20% Liquidated Damages
10% Interest (through 2/25/15)
Audit Fees

9

17

$6,099.52
$1,219.90
$661.76

$18,110.08

5

16

$13,751.15
$2,750.23
$1,608.70

12/13 Contributions
20% Liquidated Damages on 12/13 Contributions
10% Interest on 12/13 Contributions (through 2/25/15)

3

15

$10,170.42
$2,034.08
$1,273.39

$26,835.07
$366,181.14

///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
-3-

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Case No.: C13-3968 YGR
G:\YGRALL\Civil Case Files\2013\3968 Burns v Halopoff & Sons\13-3968 Burns v. Halopoff -- Revised Proposed Stipulated Judgment.docx

1

6.

This Judgment does not include withdrawal liability, if any.

2
3 Dated: March 2, 2015
4

OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL
NO. 3 TRUST FUNDS
By: ______________/S/_______________
David E. Hayner
Collections Manager for Plaintiffs

5
6
7 Dated: March 9, 2015
8

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION

9

By: ____________/S/_________________
Michele R. Stafford
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10
11
12

Dated: March 8, 2015

HALOPOFF & SONS, INC.

13

By: ___________/S/___________________
John Halopoff, President

14
15 Dated: March 9, 2015
16

MOTSCHIEDLER, MICHAELIDES, WISHON,
BREWER & RYAN, LLP

17

By: ____________/S/__________________
Justin D. Harris
Attorneys for Defendant

18
19
20
21

ORDER / JUDGMENT
Judgment shall be entered in Plaintiffs’ favor and against Defendant Halopoff & Sons in

22 the amount of $366,181.14 as set forth above.
23
24
25

Dated: March 10, 2015

_____________________________________
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

26
27
28

-4-

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Case No.: C13-3968 YGR
G:\YGRALL\Civil Case Files\2013\3968 Burns v Halopoff & Sons\13-3968 Burns v. Halopoff -- Revised Proposed Stipulated Judgment.docx

1
2

ATTESTATION CERTIFICATE
In accord with the Northern District of California’s General Order No. 45, Section X(B), I

3 attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other
4 signatories who are listed on the signature page.
5
6
7
8
9

Dated: March 9, 2015
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION
By:
/S/
Michele R. Stafford
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-5-

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
Case No.: C13-3968 YGR
G:\YGRALL\Civil Case Files\2013\3968 Burns v Halopoff & Sons\13-3968 Burns v. Halopoff -- Revised Proposed Stipulated Judgment.docx