Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. LG Electronics Inc. Et Al

Filing 67

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 66 Stipulation re 62 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Supplemental Patent Local Rule 3 Disclosures and Motion to Stay Proceedings. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

THE LAW OFFICE OF PHILIP A. LEIDER
Philip A. Leider (Cal. Bar No. 229751)
Email: [e-mail]
2709 10th Street, Unit E
Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
Steven Lieberman (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Joo Mee Kim (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Jenny L. Colgate (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Email: [e-mail]
607 14th Street N.W., Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs
LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., and
LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.

13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

OAKLAND DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION,

)
)
)
Plaintiff and
)
Counterclaim Defendant, )
)
vs.
)
)
LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
)
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., and
)
LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM
)
U.S.A., INC.,
)
)
Defendants and
)
Counterclaim Plaintiffs. )
)
)

CASE NO. 4:13-CV-04034-SBA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS
[Civil L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2]

27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON DEFS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Case No. 4:13-cv-04034-SBA

1

STIPULATION

2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Defendants, LG Electronics, Inc., LG

3

Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. (collectively

4

“Defendants”) and Plaintiff Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (“Plaintiff”) (collectively “the

5

Parties”) hereby stipulate as follows:

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

WHEREAS claim construction proceedings in this patent infringement case are
scheduled to commence on March 24, 2014 [Dkt. 50];
WHEREAS on January 24, 2014 Plaintiff served its Patent Local Rule 3-1 and 3-2
disclosures (“Plaintiff’s Disclosures”);
WHEREAS the Parties dispute the adequacy of Plaintiff’s Disclosures after having met
and conferred on the subject;
WHEREAS on March 7, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s
Disclosures and requested a hearing on or after April 15, 2014 [Dkt. 58];
WHEREAS on March 7, 2014, Plaintiff served supplemental Patent Local Rule 3
disclosures (“Plaintiff’s Supplemental Disclosures”);
WHEREAS on March 10, 2014, Defendants filed a Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s

17

Supplemental Disclosures and for a Stay of Proceedings and requested a hearing on or after April

18

15, 2014 [Dkt. 62];

19

WHEREAS the Parties disagree whether it is necessary to stay proceedings pending the

20

Court’s ruling on Defendants’ pending Motions to Strike, but the Parties agree it is critical that

21

the Court decide whether to stay proceedings before claim construction proceedings begin on

22

March 24, 2014; and

23

WHEREAS the Parties have accordingly agreed to present this stipulation and proposed

24

order to the Court for an order shortening time on the briefing of Defendants’ Motion to Stay

25

Proceedings pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2;

26
27

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG THE
PARTIES THAT:

28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON DEFS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Case No. 4:13-cv-04034-SBA

1
2
3
4
5
6

Plaintiff will file its Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings on or before
March 13, 2014; and
Defendants will file their Reply in further support of their Motion to Stay Proceedings on
or before March 14, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 11, 2014

7

KAYE SCHOLER, LLP
By:

8

/s/ Michael J. Malecek
Michael J. Malecek

Attorneys for Plaintiff & Counterclaim Defendant
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR
CORPORATION

9
10
11
12
13
14

Dated: March 11, 2014

THE LAW OFFICE OF PHILIP A. LEIDER
ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
By:

/s/ Jenny L. Colgate
Jenny L. Colgate

15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants & Counterclaim Plaintiffs
LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG ELECTRONICS
U.S.A., INC., and LG ELECTRONICS
MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON DEFS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Case No. 4:13-cv-04034-SBA

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Having considered the foregoing stipulation of the Parties, and finding good cause to
shorten time on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
Plaintiff will file its Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings on or before
March 13, 2014;
Defendants will file its Reply in further support of Defendants’ Motion to Stay
Proceedings on or before March 14, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/11/2014

_______________________________________
HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON DEFS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Case No. 4:13-cv-04034-SBA

1
2

CERTIFICATION UNDER GENERAL CIV. L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
I, Jenny L. Colgate, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

3

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Shortening Time on Defendants’ Motion to Stay

4

Proceedings. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that counsel for Defendants,

5

Michael J. Malecek, has concurred in this filing.

6
7

Dated: March 11, 2014

/s/ Jenny L. Colgate

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON DEFS’ MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Case No. 4:13-cv-04034-SBA