Ai-Daiwa, Ltd. v. Apparent, Inc. et al

Filing 39

NOTICE RE CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, Mediation, to be completed by 7/31/14. Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Selection set for 2/23/2015 0 8:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. 5 Day Jury Trial set for 2/23/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Pretrial Conference set for Friday, 2/6/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 1/16/2015 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
3
4

NOTICE RE CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER

Plaintiff(s),

5

vs.

6
7

Case No.: C-13-4156-YGR

AI-DAIWA, LTD,

APPARENT, INC. ET AL,
Defendant(s).

8
9

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

10

The Court has read and reviewed the docket in this matter in advance of the Case

11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14

Management Conference scheduled for April 7, 2014 and advises the parties in advance that the
Court will set the following trial and pretrial dates in light of the Court's docket and calendar,
including a significant multi-defendant criminal trial scheduled for 2015.
TENTATIVE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

15

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:

Monday, August 11, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

REFERRED TO PRIVATE MEDIATION TO BE
COMPLETED BY:

July 31, 2014

LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS:

Must obtain leave

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

October 31, 2014

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):

Opening: October 1, 2014
Rebuttal: October 17, 2014

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

October 31, 2014

24

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 TO BE HEARD BY:

December 2, 2014

25

COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)

Friday, January 16, 2015 at 9:01 a.m.

26

JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:

Friday, January 23, 2015

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:

Friday, February 6, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

27
28

1

See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment.

1

TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:

Monday, February 23, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.
for 5 days (Jury Trial)

2
3

Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall
4

meet and confer in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance hearing on Friday, January
5

16, 2015 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel understand the obligations required under
6

the Pretrial Order and are in the process of timely meeting and conferring as required by the Pretrial
7

Instructions. The compliance hearing shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street,
8

Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance
9

hearing, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this
10

requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not
11

appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be
12
Northern District of California

United States District Court

allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may
13

result in sanctions.
14

The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing
15

Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All Standing
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
The parties are advised that in cases assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time
to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge of their joint selection for all purposes, including
entry of final judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). This option is being made available because the
magistrate judges in this district have smaller civil dockets and no felony criminal cases and may be
able to adjudicate this case with more flexibility than the undersigned district judge. Should the
parties choose to consent to a magistrate judge of their joint selection, forms are available at
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 1, 2014

26

_______________________________________

27

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

28

2