Ai-Daiwa, Ltd. v. Apparent, Inc. et al

Filing 40

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. THE COURT HEREBY SETS THE FOLLOWING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES: ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR- Private Mediation to be completed by 7/31/14. Case Management Statement due by 8/4/2014. Non-Expert Discovery d ue by 10/31/2014. Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Selection set for 2/23/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. 5 Day Jury Trial set for 2/23/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Dispositive Motions Heard by 12/2/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Pretrial Conference set for Friday, 2 /6/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Compliance Hearing is set for Friday, 1/16/2015 09:01 AM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/7/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
3
4

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER

Plaintiff(s),

5

vs.

6
7

Case No.: C-13-4156-YGR

AI-DAIWA, LTD,

APPARENT, INC. ET AL,
Defendant(s).

8
9

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

10

The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates:

11

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:

Monday, August 11, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

REFERRED TO PRIVATE MEDIATION TO BE
COMPLETED BY:

July 31, 2014

LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS:

Must obtain leave

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

October 31, 2014

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):

Opening: October 1, 2014
Rebuttal: October 17, 2014

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:

October 31, 2014

21

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 TO BE HEARD BY:

December 2, 2014

22

COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)

Friday, January 16, 2015 at 9:01 a.m.

23

JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:

Friday, January 23, 2015

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:

Friday, February 6, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:

Monday, February 23, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.
for 5 days (Jury Trial)

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

24
25
26
27
28

1

See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment.

1

Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall

2

meet and confer in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance hearing on Friday, January

3

16, 2015 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel understand the obligations required under

4

the Pretrial Order and are in the process of timely meeting and conferring as required by the Pretrial

5

Instructions. The compliance hearing shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street,

6

Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance

7

hearing, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this

8

requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not

9

appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be

10

allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may

11

result in sanctions.

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing

13

Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All Standing

14

Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.

15

The parties are advised that in cases assigned to a district judge, the parties may consent at any time

16

to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge of their joint selection for all purposes, including

17

entry of final judgment. See Civil L.R. 73-1(b). This option is being made available because the

18

magistrate judges in this district have smaller civil dockets and no felony criminal cases and may be

19

able to adjudicate this case with more flexibility than the undersigned district judge. Should the

20

parties choose to consent to a magistrate judge of their joint selection, forms are available at

21

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, in the “Forms” section.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 7, 2014
_______________________________________

24

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

2