Nero v. BAE Systems Inc. et al

Filing 82

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 1/8/15. (nahS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
G. Daniel Newland (SBN 87965) [e-mail]
Eric M. Lloyd (SBN 254390) [e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Lynn A. Kappelman (appearance pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Two Seaport Lane, Suite 300
Boston, MA 02210
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
BAE SYSTEMS, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SHIP REPAIR,
INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SAN FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR,
INC.; HUGH VANDERSPEK; and JIM VAUGHT

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

THE FARRISE LAW FIRM, P.C.
Simona A. Farrise, Esq. (SBN 171708)
Siddharth Jhans, Esq. (SBN 254165)
901 Clay Street
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
LIBERTY LAW
Micha Star Liberty, Esq. (SBN 215687)
1970 Broadway, Suite 700
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

19
20
21
22
23

THE ARKIN LAW FIRM
Sharon J. Arkin, Esq. (SBN 154858)
225 S. Olive Street, Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Telephone: [phone]
(Facsimile) [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARTIN NERO

24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation re Dismissal; Case No. 13-04271 PJH

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

MARTIN NERO,
Plaintiff,

5
6
7
8
9

Case No. 13-04271 PJH
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

v.
BAE SYSTEMS, INC., BAE SYSTEMS SHIP
REPAIR, INC., BAE SYSTEMS SAN
FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC., HUGH
VANDERSPEK, JIM VAUGHT, and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.

10
11
12
13

Having completed their respective obligations under a written settlement agreement, Plaintiff

14

Martin Nero (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants BAE SYSTEMS, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SHIP REPAIR,

15

INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SAN FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC.; HUGH VANDERSPEK; and JIM

16

VAUGHT (“Defendants”) (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby

17

stipulate as follows:

18

1.

The above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice; and

19

2.

Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.

20

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Joint Stipulation re Dismissal; Case No. 13-04271 PJH

1

DATED: January 7, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

2

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

3
4

By:

/s/ Eric M. Lloyd
G. Daniel Newland
Lynn A. Kappelman
Eric M. Lloyd
Attorneys for Defendants
BAE SYSTEMS, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SHIP
REPAIR, INC.; BAE SYSTEMS SAN
FRANCISCO SHIP REPAIR, INC.; HUGH
VANDERSPEK; and JIM VAUGHT

5
6
7
8
9

DATED: January 7, 2015

THE FARRISE LAW FIRM, P.C.

10
11

By:

/s/ Simona A. Farrise
Simona A. Farrise
Siddharth Jhans
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARTIN NERO

12
13
14

DATED: January 7 , 2015

LIBERTY LAW

15
16

By:

/s/ Micha Star Liberty
Micha Star Liberty
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARTIN NERO

17
18
DATED: January 7, 2015

THE ARKIN LAW FIRM

19
20
By:

/s/ Sharon J. Arkin
Sharon J. Arkin
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARTIN NERO

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Joint Stipulation re Dismissal ; Case No. 13-04271 PJH

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each
3
party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

RT

ER

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Joint Stipulation re Dismissal; Case No. 13-04271 PJH

R NIA

Ham

A

H

11

Judge P

FO

hyllis J.

NO

10

________________________________
ERED
Hon. Phyllis J. SO ORD
IT IS Hamilton
United States District Court Judge
ilton
LI

, 2015

S

DATE: January 8

UNIT
ED

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

8

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C