RILEY et al v. RICHARDSON et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 11/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/30/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 PHILIP JUSTIN RILEY, et al., No. C-13-04364 DMR 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 16 DESS RICHARDSON, et al., 17 18 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 19 On June 21, 2013, Plaintiffs Philip Justin Riley and Glenn Michael Kuder, proceeding 20 without legal representation, filed this lawsuit. On September 25, 2013, the clerk mailed a notice to 21 file a consent or declination to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to Plaintiffs' address of record. 22 The Clerk’s Notice was subsequently returned as undeliverable. [Docket Nos. 7, 8.] On October 11, 23 2013, Defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. filed a 24 motion for a more definite statement. [Docket No. 9.] According to the local Court rules, Plaintiffs 25 should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendants' motion by October 25, 2013. See N.D. Cal. 26 Civ. L.R. 7-3. The court has received no such opposition. 27 28 1 Therefore, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to respond by November 15, 2013 and explain why 2 this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to respond by November 15, 2013 3 may result in dismissal of this action. 7 Dated: October 30, 2013 NO onna DONNAuM. e D J dg RYU 8 RT 9 ER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 A H 11 For the Northern District of California M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge 10 United States District Court D RDERE OO IT IS S R NIA 6 FO IT IS SO ORDERED. LI S UNIT ED 5 RT U O 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?