RILEY et al v. RICHARDSON et al
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 11/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/30/2013. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
PHILIP JUSTIN RILEY, et al.,
No. C-13-04364 DMR
14
Plaintiffs,
15
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
16
DESS RICHARDSON, et al.,
17
18
Defendants.
___________________________________/
19
On June 21, 2013, Plaintiffs Philip Justin Riley and Glenn Michael Kuder, proceeding
20
without legal representation, filed this lawsuit. On September 25, 2013, the clerk mailed a notice to
21
file a consent or declination to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to Plaintiffs' address of record.
22
The Clerkâs Notice was subsequently returned as undeliverable. [Docket Nos. 7, 8.] On October 11,
23
2013, Defendants Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. filed a
24
motion for a more definite statement. [Docket No. 9.] According to the local Court rules, Plaintiffs
25
should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendants' motion by October 25, 2013. See N.D. Cal.
26
Civ. L.R. 7-3. The court has received no such opposition.
27
28
1
Therefore, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to respond by November 15, 2013 and explain why
2
this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to respond by November 15, 2013
3
may result in dismissal of this action.
7
Dated: October 30, 2013
NO
onna
DONNAuM. e D
J dg RYU
8
RT
9
ER
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
A
H
11
For the Northern District of California
M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
10
United States District Court
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
R NIA
6
FO
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LI
S
UNIT
ED
5
RT
U
O
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?