Simmons et al v. Pittsburgs Unified School District et al

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER, see 59 : responses to motion for attorneys fees due by 7/14/2014, replies due by 7/21/2014. Motion hearing continued to 8/21/2014 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 06/25/2014. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JEAN MURREL ADAMS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 138458) GAIL S. HODES, ESQ. (State Bar No. 139693) ADAMS ESQ, A Professional Corporation 1300 Clay Street, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 832-6000 Facsimile: (510) 832-3099 jmurrelladams@adamsesq.com gailhodes1@gmail.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Jean Murrell Adams TIMOTHY P. MURPHY, Esq. (120920) DOLORES M. DONOHOE, Esq. (111432) EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP 2300 Contra Costa Boulevard, Suite 450 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3936 Telephone: (925) 827-3300 Facsimile: (925) 827-3320 TMurphy@esmlawfirm.com LDonohoe@esmlawfirm.com Attorneys for Defendants PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 BRIANNA, an individual and ARLICIA SIMMONS CASE NO.: C-134446-KAW an Individual, 18 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION ANDORDER TO CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 19 v. FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND RELATED OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS 20 PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL (L.Rule 7-7) DISTRICT; ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL 21 DISTRICT, and DOES 2-20, 22 Defendants. 23 / 24 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7, the plaintiffs BRIANNA and ARLICIA SIMMONS and 25 defendant PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, through their attorneys of record, 26 hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees, currently set for hearing on 27 1 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND RELATED OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS CASE NO.: C-13-4446-KAW 1 August 7, 2014 be continued to August 14, 2014 and that defendant’s Opposition Brief be filed 2 no later than July 14, 2014 and plaintiffs’ Reply Brief be filed no later than seven (7) days after 3 the Opposition Brief is filed. 4 DATED: By 5 6 7 8 DATED: By 9 10 ADAMS ESQ, A Professional Corporation /s/ Gail S. Hodes, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs, BRIANNA, an individual and ARLICIA SIMMONS an individual EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP /s/ Dolores M. Donohoe Attorney for Defendant, PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 11 12 13 CERTIFICATION BY DOLORES M. DONOHOE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE NO.51, SECTION (i)(3). RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES 1. 14 I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California, and am an 15 attorney in the law firm of Edrington, Schirmer & Murphy, counsel for Defendants PITTSBURG 16 UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. The statements 17 herein are made on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness, I could and would testify 18 thereto. 19 2. 20 been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the 21 Court. 22 concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request 23 by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). 24 25 The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence has Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, section (i)(3), I shall maintain records to support this I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of California that the foregoing is true and correct on June 25, 2014 26 27 2 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND RELATED OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS CASE NO.: C-13-4446-KAW 1 DATED: 2 EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP By 3 4 /s/ Dolores M. Donohoe Attorney for Defendant, PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 ORDER 6 In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing 7 8 on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees, currently set for August 7, 2014 be continued to August 21, 2014 and that defendant’s Opposition Brief be filed no later than July 14, 2014 and plaintiffs’ 9 Reply Brief be filed no later than seven (7) days after the Opposition Brief is filed. 10 11 June 25, 2014 DATED: ____________________ 12 13 14 By_ Kandis A. Westmore United States District Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 3 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND RELATED OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS CASE NO.: C-13-4446-KAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?