Simmons et al v. Pittsburgs Unified School District et al
Filing
60
STIPULATION AND ORDER, see 59 : responses to motion for attorneys fees due by 7/14/2014, replies due by 7/21/2014. Motion hearing continued to 8/21/2014 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 06/25/2014. (kawlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
JEAN MURREL ADAMS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 138458)
GAIL S. HODES, ESQ. (State Bar No. 139693)
ADAMS ESQ, A Professional Corporation
1300 Clay Street, Suite 600
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 832-6000
Facsimile: (510) 832-3099
jmurrelladams@adamsesq.com
gailhodes1@gmail.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Jean Murrell Adams
TIMOTHY P. MURPHY, Esq. (120920)
DOLORES M. DONOHOE, Esq. (111432)
EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP
2300 Contra Costa Boulevard, Suite 450
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3936
Telephone: (925) 827-3300
Facsimile: (925) 827-3320
TMurphy@esmlawfirm.com
LDonohoe@esmlawfirm.com
Attorneys for Defendants
PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17 BRIANNA, an individual and ARLICIA SIMMONS CASE NO.: C-134446-KAW
an Individual,
18
Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION ANDORDER TO
CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
19
v.
FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND RELATED
OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS
20 PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL
(L.Rule 7-7)
DISTRICT; ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL
21 DISTRICT, and DOES 2-20,
22
Defendants.
23
/
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-7, the plaintiffs BRIANNA and ARLICIA SIMMONS and
25
defendant PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, through their attorneys of record,
26
hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees, currently set for hearing on
27
1
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND RELATED
OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS
CASE NO.: C-13-4446-KAW
1
August 7, 2014 be continued to August 14, 2014 and that defendant’s Opposition Brief be filed
2
no later than July 14, 2014 and plaintiffs’ Reply Brief be filed no later than seven (7) days after
3
the Opposition Brief is filed.
4
DATED:
By
5
6
7
8
DATED:
By
9
10
ADAMS ESQ, A Professional Corporation
/s/
Gail S. Hodes, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
BRIANNA, an individual and ARLICIA
SIMMONS an individual
EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP
/s/
Dolores M. Donohoe
Attorney for Defendant,
PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
11
12
13
CERTIFICATION BY DOLORES M. DONOHOE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE NO.51, SECTION (i)(3). RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES
1.
14
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California, and am an
15
attorney in the law firm of Edrington, Schirmer & Murphy, counsel for Defendants PITTSBURG
16
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. The statements
17
herein are made on my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness, I could and would testify
18
thereto.
19
2.
20
been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the
21
Court.
22
concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request
23
by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any).
24
25
The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence has
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, section (i)(3), I shall maintain records to support this
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of California that the
foregoing is true and correct on June 25, 2014
26
27
2
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND RELATED
OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS
CASE NO.: C-13-4446-KAW
1
DATED:
2
EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP
By
3
4
/s/
Dolores M. Donohoe
Attorney for Defendant,
PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
5
ORDER
6
In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing
7
8
on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees, currently set for August 7, 2014 be continued to August
21, 2014 and that defendant’s Opposition Brief be filed no later than July 14, 2014 and plaintiffs’
9
Reply Brief be filed no later than seven (7) days after the Opposition Brief is filed.
10
11
June 25, 2014
DATED: ____________________
12
13
14
By_
Kandis A. Westmore
United States District Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND RELATED
OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS
CASE NO.: C-13-4446-KAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?