Jetmore Stoddard-Nunez et al v. City Of Hayward et al
Filing
121
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 120 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Alteration of Expert Discovery Deadlines filed by Jessie Lee Jetmore Stoddard-Nunez, City of Hayward, Manuel Troche. Close of Expert Discovery due by 10/13/2017. Expert Disclosure due by 9/12/2017. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by 9/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 8/10/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
MICHAEL S, LAWSON (SBN 048172)
City Attorney
JOSEPH E. BRICK (SBN 253132)
Assistant City Attorney
CITY OF HAYWARD
777 B Street, 4th Floor
Hayward, CA 94541-5007
Tel: (510) 583-4450
Fax: (510) 583-3660
Michael.Lawson@Hayward–ca.gov Joseph.Brick@Hayward-ca.gov
6
7
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF HAYWARD AND OFFICER TROCHE
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHER DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)
10
CASE NO.: C13-04490 KAW (ADR)
11
12
JESSIE LEE JETMORE STODDARDNUNEZ, et al.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
[Assigned for All Purposes to
Hon. Kandis Westmore, Courtroom 4]
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR ALTERATION OF EXPERT
DISCOVERY DEADLINES
CITY OF HAYWARD et al,
Defendants.
COMPLAINT FILED: September 27, 2013
TRIAL DATE:
December 4, 2017
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff, JESSIE LEE JETMORE STODDARD-NUNEZ, and Defendants CITY OF
HAYWARD, and MANUEL TROCHE, jointly stipulate as follows:
1. The following deadlines were set by the Court in its March 9, 2017, Amended Case
26
Management and Pretrial Order for Jury Trial (Dkt. No. 84):
27
a. Close of Expert Discovery: September 29, 2017;
28
b. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure and Reports Provided: September 15, 2017; and
c. Expert Disclosure and Reports Provided: August 29, 2017
Stoddard-Nunez v. City of Hayward
Case No. C13-04490 KAW
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
-1-
1
2. In an effort to reduce the costs associated with litigation, and in light of the hearing on the
2
defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment was reset for September 7, 2017, the parties
3
wish to continue certain expert discovery deadlines by approximately two weeks as more
4
specifically set forth below;
5
3. This slight modification of the expert discovery deadlines in the best interests of the parties
6
and will not unduly burden the Court in any foreseeable way as all other dates are to remain
7
the same;
8
9
4. Accordingly, the parties propose the following changes to the March 9, 2017, Scheduling
Order (Dkt. No. 84):
10
a. Close of Expert Discovery: October 13, 2017;
11
b. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure and Reports Provided: September 29, 2017; and
12
c. Expert Disclosure and Reports Provided: September 12, 2017.
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
15
16
DATED: August 9, 2017
MICHAEL S. LAWSON, City Attorney
17
By:
18
19
___________/s/____________________________
Joseph E. Brick, Assistant City Attorney
Attorneys for City of Hayward & Officer Troche
20
21
22
DATED: August 9, 2017
23
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
By:
24
25
/s/
Adante Pointer, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff, Jessie Stoddard-Nunez, et al.
26
27
28
Stoddard-Nunez v. City of Hayward
Case No. C13-04490 KAW
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
-2-
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and for good cause appearing therefore:
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
10
1. Close of Expert Discovery previously scheduled for September 29, 2017, is continued to
October 13, 2017;
2. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure and Reports Provided previously for September 15, 2017, is
continued to September 29, 2017;
3. Expert Disclosure and Reports Provided previously scheduled for August 29, 2017, is continued
to September 12, 2017.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED
14
15
8/10/17
Dated: __________________
________________________________
16
HONORABLE KANDIS WESTMORE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stoddard-Nunez v. City of Hayward
Case No. C13-04490 KAW
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?